Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

How to prevent Closure Compiler from renaming "true", "false" and "null"

Google Closure Compiler renames all "true", "false" and "null" occurences in code like;

var s = true, x = null, V = false;

and uses these shorthands instead; in conditions such as;

if (someVariable == s)

now; Google Analytics code defines it's own "s" variable; overriding the value "true"; and as you can see this causes a lot of problems.

I don't want to change GA code; I just want Closure Compiler to quit renaming true etc. Externs do not work.

Do you know any way to accomplish this?

like image 721
dashersw Avatar asked Jan 06 '11 18:01

dashersw


2 Answers

Your main problem here is that your code runs in the global scope/namespace, that's why things crash.

To fix it, put it inside an anonymous function wrapper:

(function() {
    // a self contained "namespace"
    var s = true; // won't be affected by the analytics code anymore       


    // expose something
    window.foo = function() {};

})(); // execute the function immediately

This is the common idiom to prevent clashes of variable names etc. If you need to make things available outside of the wrapper, simply add them as properties to the window object.

Don't bother to mess with closure, when you change your code it might end up giving the variables different names. Also what when there are all of a sudden more global variables on your page? All those problems are good reasons to always put your code in a wrapper like the above.

like image 42
Ivo Wetzel Avatar answered Nov 15 '22 06:11

Ivo Wetzel


It turns out that one can prevent Google Closure Compiler from printing out global definitions (function and/or variable) by a parameter called "output_wrapper" to the command line code such as;

java -jar compiler.jar --compilation_level ADVANCED_OPTIMIZATIONS --output_wrapper "(function(){%output%})();" --js input.js --js_output_file output.js

This way, it doesn't collide with global variables and prints all your code in an anonymous function wrapper.

like image 142
dashersw Avatar answered Nov 15 '22 07:11

dashersw