This is what I have: All objects that can be persisted on the database extend the DatabaseObject abstract class, which has all the logic code to actually watch for attribute changes and run the databas queries.
I'm using two static variables to define object-specific details. I define them generically in the base class, and then supposedly I overwrite them in the actual database objects.
The problem is: When the code in the parent class is actually executed, it uses the old parent value instead of the current object value.
Here's the code for the base class:
abstract class DatabaseObject { public $id; private static $databaseTable = NULL; private static $databaseFields = array(); private $data = array(); private $changedFields = array(); public function IDatabaseObject($id) { $this->id = $id; $this->data = Database::GetSingle(self::$databaseTable, $id); Utils::copyToObject($this, $this->data, self::$databaseFields); } public static function Load($id) { return new self($userID); } public static function Create($data) { $id = Database::Insert(self::$databaseTable, $data); return new self($id); } public function Save() { $data = Utils::copyFromObject($this, $this->changedFields); Database::Update(self::$databaseTable, $data, $this->id); } public function __constructor() { // We do this to allow __get and __set to be called on public vars foreach(self::$databaseFields as $field) { unset($this->$field); } } public function __get($variableName) { return $this->$variableName; } public function __set($variableName, $variableValue) { // We only want to update what has been changed if(!in_array($variableName, $this->changedFields) && in_array($variableName, self::$databaseFields)) { array_push($this->changedFields, $variableName); } $this->$variableName = $variableValue; } }
And here's the code for one of the objects extending the base class above:
class Client extends DatabaseObject { public static $databaseTable = "clients"; public static $databaseFields = array("name","contactName","primaryUserID","email","is_active","rg","cpf","cnpj","ie","addrType","addrName","addrNumber","addrComplement","addrPostalCode","addrNeighborhood","addrCity","addrState","addrCountry","phoneLandline","phoneFax","phoneMobile"); public $name; public $contactName; public $primaryUserID; public $email; public $is_active; public $rg; public $cpf; public $cnpj; public $ie; public $addrType; public $addrName; public $addrNumber; public $addrComplement; public $addrPostalCode; public $addrNeighborhood; public $addrCity; public $addrState; public $addrCountry; public $phoneLandline; public $phoneFax; public $phoneMobile; public static function Load($id) { return new Client($id); } }
What am I doing wrong here? Is there another way I can achieve the same result?
A brief addendum: I declare the attributes in the class body mainly to let it be seen by the NetBeans' auto-complete feature.
No, we cannot override static methods because method overriding is based on dynamic binding at runtime and the static methods are bonded using static binding at compile time. So, we cannot override static methods.
You can't use $this inside a static function, because static functions are independent of any instantiated object. Try making the function not static. Edit: By definition, static methods can be called without any instantiated object, and thus there is no meaningful use of $this inside a static method.
Static properties are accessed using the Scope Resolution Operator ( :: ) and cannot be accessed through the object operator ( -> ). It's possible to reference the class using a variable. The variable's value cannot be a keyword (e.g. self , parent and static ). print $foo::$my_static .
No. Static can be used to declare class variables or within function to declare a variable which persists over function calls, but not over executions of the script.
You are looking for Late Static Binding.
So you need to use:
static::$databaseTable
instead of
self::$databaseTable
This feature is available as of PHP 5.3. Simulating this in PHP 5.2 is very hard, because of two reasons: get_called_class
is available only since PHP 5.3, too. Therefore it must be simulated, too, using debug_backtrace
. The second problem is, that if you have the called class, you still may not use $calledClass::$property
because this is a PHP 5.3 feature, too. Here you need to use eval
or Reflection
. So I do hope that you have PHP 5.3 ;)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With