What is the best way to normalize reviews? I.E. lets assume we have products that users can vote from 1-5 stars.
Simply taking the average is not a good way, because it does not account for the number of reviews.
For example, if a product only has one review of a 5 star, it should not be ahead of a product with 10000 reviews, simply because the only review gave it 5 stars.
Essentially how do I normalize the score based on the number of reviews as well?
About Normalization. Normalization means adjusting values measured on different scales to a notionally common scale. Need for Normalization in Exam. Exam pertaining for a particular post/course could be spread across multiple shifts which will have different question paper for each shift.
I am sorry if my answer looks crazy. But when I first saw your question, the following answer came to my mind.
The formula for calculating the Top Rated 250 Titles gives a true Bayesian estimate:
weighted rating (WR) = (v ÷ (v+m)) × R + (m ÷ (v+m)) × C
where:
R = average for the movie (mean) = (Rating)
v = number of votes for the movie = (votes)
m = minimum votes required to be listed in the Top 250 (currently 3000)
C = the mean vote across the whole report (currently 6.9)
(This is how IMDB ranks their top films according to user reviews and votes. Below is a link to the page where I got the above passage: http://www.imdb.com/chart/top.)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With