I'm writing a small API in Laravel, partly for the purposes of learning this framework. I think I have spotted a gaping hole in the docs, but it may be due to my not understanding the "Laravel way" to do what I want.
I am writing an HTTP API to, amongst other things, list, create and delete system users on a Linux server. The structure is like so:
/v1/users
connect GET
, POST
and DELETE
verbs to controller methods get
, create
and delete
respectively.App\Http\Controllers\UserController
does not actually run system calls, that is done by a service App\Services\Users
.App\Providers\Server\Users
that registers a singleton
of the service on a deferred basis.OK, so this all works. I have also written some test code, like so:
public function testGetUsers()
{
$response = $this->json('GET', '/v1/users');
/* @var $response \Illuminate\Http\JsonResponse */
$response
->assertStatus(200)
->assertJson(['ok' => true, ]);
}
This also works fine. However, this uses the normal bindings for the UserService
, and I want to put a dummy/mock in here instead.
I think I need to change my UserService
to an interface, which is easy, but I am not sure how to tell the underlying test system that I want it to run my controller, but with a non-standard service. I see App::bind()
cropping up in Stack Overflow answers when researching this, but App
is not automatically in scope in artisan-generated tests, so it feels like clutching at straws.
How can I instantiate a dummy service and then send it to Laravel when testing, so it does not use the standard ServiceProvider instead?
Unlike traditional static method calls, facades may be mocked. We can mock the call to the static facade method by using the shouldReceive method, which will return an instance of a Mockery mock.
When testing Laravel applications, you may wish to "mock" certain aspects of your application so they are not actually executed during a given test. For example, when testing a controller that dispatches an event, you may wish to mock the event listeners so they are not actually executed during the test.
Likewise, PHPUnit mock object is a simulated object that performs the behavior of a part of the application that is required in the unit test. The developers control the mock object by defining the pre-computed results on the actions.
The obvious way is to re-bind the implementation in setUp()
.
Make your self a new UserTestCase
(or edit the one provided by Laravel) and add:
abstract class TestCase extends BaseTestCase
{
use CreatesApplication;
protected function setUp()
{
parent::setUp();
app()->bind(YourService::class, function() { // not a service provider but the target of service provider
return new YourFakeService();
});
}
}
class YourFakeService {} // I personally keep fakes in the test files itself if they are short
Register providers conditionally based on environment (put this in AppServiceProvider.php or any other provider that you designate for this task - ConditionalLoaderServiceProvider.php or whatever) in register()
method
if (app()->environment('testing')) {
app()->register(FakeUserProvider::class);
} else {
app()->register(UserProvider::class);
}
Note: drawback is that list of providers is on two places one in config/app.php and one in the AppServiceProvider.php
Aha, I have found a temporary solution. I'll post it here, and then explain how it can be improved.
<?php
namespace Tests\Feature;
use Tests\TestCase;
use \App\Services\Users as UsersService;
class UsersTest extends TestCase
{
/**
* Checks the listing of users
*
* @return void
*/
public function testGetUsers()
{
$this->app->bind(UsersService::class, function() {
return new UsersDummy();
});
$response = $this->json('GET', '/v1/users');
$response
->assertStatus(200)
->assertJson(['ok' => true, ]);
}
}
class UsersDummy extends UsersService
{
public function listUsers()
{
return ['tom', 'dick', 'harry', ];
}
}
This injects a DI binding so that the default ServiceProvider does not need to kick in. If I add some debug code to $response
like so:
/* @var $response \Illuminate\Http\JsonResponse */
print_r($response->getData(true));
then I get this output:
Array
(
[ok] => 1
[users] => Array
(
[0] => tom
[1] => dick
[2] => harry
)
)
This has allowed me to create a test with a boundary drawn around the PHP, and no calls are made to the test box to interact with the user system.
I will next investigate whether my controller's constructor can be changed from a concrete implementation hint (\App\Services\Users
) to an interface, so that my test implementation does not need to extend from the real one.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With