I have run across the following pattern a few times while developing Perl modules that use AUTOLOAD
or other subroutine dispatch techniques:
sub AUTOLOAD {
my $self = $_[0];
my $code = $self->figure_out_code_ref( $AUTOLOAD );
goto &$code;
}
This works fine, and caller
sees the correct scope.
Now what I would like to do is to locally set $_
equal to $self
during the execution of &$code
. Which would be something like this:
sub AUTOLOAD {
my $self = $_[0];
my $code = $self->figure_out_code_ref( $AUTOLOAD );
local *_ = \$self;
# and now the question is how to call &$code
# goto &$code; # wont work since local scope changes will
# be unrolled before the goto
# &$code; # will preserve the local, but caller will report an
# additional stack frame
}
Solutions that involve wrapping caller
are not acceptable due to performance and dependency issues. So that seems to rule out the second option.
Moving back to the first, the only way to prevent the new value of $_
from going out of scope during the goto
would be to either not localize the change (not a viable option) or to implement some sort of uplevel_local
or goto_with_local
.
I have played around with all sorts of permutations involving PadWalker
, Sub::Uplevel
, Scope::Upper
, B::Hooks::EndOfScope
and others, but have not been able to come up with a robust solution that cleans up $_
at the right time, and does not wrap caller
.
Has anyone found a pattern that works in this case?
(the SO question: How can I localize Perl variables in a different stack frame? is related, but preserving caller
was not a requirement, and ultimately the answer there was to use a different approach, so that solution is not helpful in this case)
Sub::Uplevel appears to work -- at least for a simple case not involving AUTOLOAD:
use strict;
use warnings;
use Sub::Uplevel;
$_ = 1;
bar();
sub foo {
printf "%s %s %d - %s\n", caller, $_
}
sub bar {
my $code = \&foo;
my $x = 2;
local *_ = \$x;
uplevel 1, $code;
}
The output is:
main c:\temp\foo.pl 6 - 2
Granted, this doesn't really localize a variable in the parent scope, but I don't think you would really want to do that even if you could. You only want to localize $_
for the duration of the call.
The perlfunc documentation for goto
points out (emphasis added)
The
goto-&NAME
form is quite different from the other forms of "goto". In fact, it isn't a goto in the normal sense at all, and doesn't have the stigma associated with other gotos. Instead, it exits the current subroutine (losing any changes set bylocal
) …
What sorts of performance concerns allow for indirection through autoloading but not through a wrapper?
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With