I am writing a simple JUnit test for the MyObject
class.
A MyObject
can be created from a static factory method that takes a varargs of String.
MyObject.ofComponents("Uno", "Dos", "Tres");
At any time during the existence of MyObject
, clients can inspect the parameters it was created by in the form of a List<E>, through the .getComponents()
method.
myObject.ofComponents(); // -> List<String>: { "Uno", "Dos", "Tres" }
In other words, a MyObject
both remembers and exposes the list of parameters that brought it into existence. More details about this contract:
getComponents
will be the same as the one chosen for object creationnull
is undefined (other code guarantees no null
gets to the factory)I am writing a simple test that creates a MyObject
from a list of String and checks that it can return the same list via .getComponents()
. I do this immediately but this is supposed to happen at a distance in a realistic code path.
Here my attempt:
List<String> argumentComponents = Lists.newArrayList("One", "Two", "Three"); List<String> returnedComponents = MyObject.ofComponents( argumentComponents.toArray(new String[argumentComponents.size()])) .getComponents(); assertTrue(Iterables.elementsEqual(argumentComponents, returnedComponents));
Iterables.elementsEqual()
the best way, provided I have the library in my build path, to compare those two lists? this is something I have been agonizing about; should I use this helper method which goes over an Iterable<E>.. check size and then iterate running .equals()
.. or any other of the methods that an Internet search suggests? what's the canonical way to compare lists for unit tests? .toArray()
the best way to convert a List<E> to a varargs of E?Using JUnit We can use the logic below to compare the equality of two lists using the assertTrue and assertFalse methods. In this first test, the size of both lists is compared before we check if the elements in both lists are the same. As both of these conditions return true, our test will pass.
A simple solution to compare two lists of primitive types for equality is using the List. equals() method. It returns true if both lists have the same size, and all corresponding pairs of elements in both lists are equal.
You should always use . equals() when comparing Strings in Java. JUnit calls the . equals() method to determine equality in the method assertEquals(Object o1, Object o2) .
Why not simply use List#equals
?
assertEquals(argumentComponents, imapPathComponents);
Contract of List#equals
:
two lists are defined to be equal if they contain the same elements in the same order.
I prefer using Hamcrest because it gives much better output in case of a failure
Assert.assertThat(listUnderTest, IsIterableContainingInOrder.contains(expectedList.toArray()));
Instead of reporting
expected true, got false
it will report
expected List containing "1, 2, 3, ..." got list containing "4, 6, 2, ..."
IsIterableContainingInOrder.contain
Hamcrest
According to the Javadoc:
Creates a matcher for Iterables that matches when a single pass over the examined Iterable yields a series of items, each logically equal to the corresponding item in the specified items. For a positive match, the examined iterable must be of the same length as the number of specified items
So the listUnderTest
must have the same number of elements and each element must match the expected values in order.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With