Below is a simple echo server. But if the client does not send anything for 10 seconds, I want to close the connection.
import asyncio
async def process(reader: asyncio.StreamReader, writer: asyncio.StreamWriter):
print("awaiting for data")
line = await reader.readline()
print(f"received {line}")
writer.write(line)
print(f"sent {line}")
await writer.drain()
print(f"Drained")
async def timeout(task: asyncio.Task, duration):
print("timeout started")
await asyncio.sleep(duration)
print("client unresponsive, cancelling")
task.cancel()
print("task cancelled")
async def new_session(reader, writer):
print("new session started")
task = asyncio.create_task(process(reader, writer))
timer = asyncio.create_task(timeout(task, 10))
await task
print("task complete")
timer.cancel()
print("timer cancelled")
writer.close()
print("writer closed")
async def a_main():
server = await asyncio.start_server(new_session, port=8088)
await server.serve_forever()
if __name__ == '__main__':
asyncio.run(a_main())
If the client sends a message, it works fine. But the other case, when client is silent, it does not work
When client sends message:
new session started
awaiting for data
timeout started
received b'slkdfjsdlkfj\r\n'
sent b'slkdfjsdlkfj\r\n'
Drained
task complete
timer cancelled
writer closed
When client is silent after opening connection
new session started
awaiting for data
timeout started
client unresponsive, cancelling
task cancelled
There is no task complete
, timer cancelled
, writer closed
.
Update
Figured out the problem, Looks like the task was actually cancelled, but the exception got silently ignored, Fixed the problem by catching CancelledError
async def new_session(reader, writer):
print("new session started")
task = asyncio.create_task(process(reader, writer))
timer = asyncio.create_task(timeout(task, 10))
try:
await task
except asyncio.CancelledError:
print(f"Task took too long and was cancelled by timer")
print("task complete")
timer.cancel()
print("timer cancelled")
writer.close()
print("writer closed")
Second part still remains. Is there a better way to implement timeouts?
Update2
Complete code using wait_for
. The timeout code is no longer needed. Check accepted solution below:
async def new_session(reader, writer):
print("new session started")
try:
await asyncio.wait_for(process(reader, writer), timeout=5)
except asyncio.TimeoutError as te:
print(f'time is up!{te}')
finally:
writer.close()
print("writer closed")
I use the following code when making a connection. I'd suggest using wait_for similarly for your code.
fut = asyncio.open_connection( self.host, self.port, loop=self.loop )
try:
r, w = await asyncio.wait_for(fut, timeout=self.connection_timeout)
except asyncio.TimeoutError:
pass
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With