I have a directive with a template like
<div> <div ng-repeat="item in items" ng-click="updateModel(item)"> <div>
My directive is declared as:
return { templateUrl: '...', restrict: 'E', require: '^ngModel', scope: { items: '=', ngModel: '=', ngChange: '&' }, link: function postLink(scope, element, attrs) { scope.updateModel = function(item) { scope.ngModel = item; scope.ngChange(); } } }
I would like to have ng-change
called when an item is clicked and the value of foo
has been changed already.
That is, if my directive is implemented as:
<my-directive items=items ng-model="foo" ng-change="bar(foo)"></my-directive>
I would expect to call bar
when the value of foo
has been updated.
With code given above, ngChange
is successfully called, but it is called with the old value of foo
instead of the new updated value.
One way to solve the problem is to call ngChange
inside a timeout to execute it at some point in the future, when the value of foo
has been already changed. But this solution make me loose control over the order in which things are supposed to be executed and I assume that there should be a more elegant solution.
I could also use a watcher over foo
in the parent scope, but this solution doesn't really give an ngChange
method to be implmented and I have been told that watchers are great memory consumers.
Is there a way to make ngChange
be executed synchronously without a timeout or a watcher?
Example: http://plnkr.co/edit/8H6QDO8OYiOyOx8efhyJ?p=preview
If you require ngModel
you can just call $setViewValue
on the ngModelController
, which implicitly evaluates ng-change
. The fourth parameter to the linking function should be the ngModelCtrl. The following code will make ng-change
work for your directive.
link : function(scope, element, attrs, ngModelCtrl){ scope.updateModel = function(item) { ngModelCtrl.$setViewValue(item); } }
In order for your solution to work, please remove ngChange and ngModel from isolate scope of myDirective.
Here's a plunk: http://plnkr.co/edit/UefUzOo88MwOMkpgeX07?p=preview
tl;dr
In my experience you just need to inherit from the ngModelCtrl. the ng-change
expression will be automatically evaluated when you use the method ngModelCtrl.$setViewValue
angular.module("myApp").directive("myDirective", function(){ return { require:"^ngModel", // this is important, scope:{ ... // put the variables you need here but DO NOT have a variable named ngModel or ngChange }, link: function(scope, elt, attrs, ctrl){ // ctrl here is the ngModelCtrl scope.setValue = function(value){ ctrl.$setViewValue(value); // this line will automatically eval your ng-change }; } }; });
More precisely
ng-change
is evaluated during the ngModelCtrl.$commitViewValue()
IF the object reference of your ngModel has changed. the method $commitViewValue()
is called automatically by $setViewValue(value, trigger)
if you do not use the trigger argument or have not precised any ngModelOptions.
I specified that the ng-change
would be automatically triggered if the reference of the $viewValue
changed. When your ngModel
is a string
or an int
, you don't have to worry about it. If your ngModel
is an object and your just changing some of its properties, then $setViewValue
will not eval ngChange
.
If we take the code example from the start of the post
scope.setValue = function(value){ ctrl.$setViewValue(value); // this line will automatically evalyour ng-change }; scope.updateValue = function(prop1Value){ var vv = ctrl.$viewValue; vv.prop1 = prop1Value; ctrl.$setViewValue(vv); // this line won't eval the ng-change expression };
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With