In HTML5, some meta elements do not validate (yet?) like:
<meta http-equiv="x-ua-compatible" content="ie=emulateie7;chrome=1">
<meta http-equiv="imagetoolbar" content="no">
Are Conditional Comments an appropriate solution here resp. will meta elements still work as expected?
<!--[if IE]><meta http-equiv="x-ua-compatible" content="ie=emulateie7;chrome=1"><![endif]-->
<!--[if lt IE 7]><meta http-equiv="imagetoolbar" content="no"><![endif]-->
Using a .htaccess file instead of meta elements (not always possible unfortunately), would this be the right way to go?
<IfModule mod_setenvif.c>
<IfModule mod_headers.c>
# BrowserMatch MSIE ie OR?
BrowserMatch MSIE emulate_ie7
# Header set X-UA-Compatible "IE=EmulateIE7" env=ie OR?
Header set X-UA-Compatible "IE=EmulateIE7" env=emulate_ie7
BrowserMatch chromeframe gcf
Header append X-UA-Compatible "chrome=1" env=gcf
</IfModule>
</IfModule>
Thanks!
Personally for the "x-ua-compatible" tag, i went for the .htaccess directive. I followed the html5boilerplate template:
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
# Better website experience for IE users
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
# Force the latest IE version, in various cases when it may fall back to IE7 mode
# github.com/rails/rails/commit/123eb25#commitcomment-118920
# Use ChromeFrame if it's installed for a better experience for the poor IE folk
<IfModule mod_setenvif.c>
<IfModule mod_headers.c>
BrowserMatch MSIE ie
Header set X-UA-Compatible "IE=Edge,chrome=1" env=ie
</IfModule>
</IfModule>
<IfModule mod_headers.c>
# Because X-UA-Compatible isn't sent to non-IE (to save header bytes),
# We need to inform proxies that content changes based on UA
Header append Vary User-Agent
# Cache control is set only if mod_headers is enabled, so that's unncessary to declare
</IfModule>
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With