Basically, what I want to do is force the subclass to call an abstract superclass method (implemented in the subclass), so I don't have to explicitly write it each time I create a new subclass.
I wrote it in the superclass' constructor once, because I want it to force it for every implementation.
public abstract class SupahClass {
public SupahClass() {
doStuff(); // It IS executed when the subclass constructor is called
init(); // NOT executed, even though it's implemented
}
private void doStuff() { ... }
protected abstract void init();
}
public class SomeSubClass extends SupahClass {
// The problem lies HERE: this is executed AFTER init() ... so it gets NULL again
private TextBox myTextBox = null;
public SomeSubClass() {
super(); // invokes the super constructor, so init() should be called
// I could call init(); here EACH time i create a new subclass... but no :)
}
@Override
public void init() {
this.myTextBox = new TextBox(); // Executed BEFORE its declared as null above
}
}
Of course, the superclass can't really call it since its an abstract (so undefined) method, but its an ABSTRACT class so it cannot be instanciated, it must delegate the task to its subclasses, so why cant they call the abstract but now implemented method?
EDIT
See the subclass property myTextBox
and the init()
implementation
Which approach do you think I should do? Remove the = null
in the property declaration (duhhh)
or remove the init()
in the superclass and explicitly calling it in the subclass constructor (this is what I wanted to avoid, since I will have to write it 100% of the time..)
I can't reproduce this. init()
will be called, assuming no exceptions are thrown first. Short but complete example:
abstract class Superclass {
public Superclass() {
init();
}
protected abstract void init();
}
class Subclass extends Superclass {
public Subclass() {
super();
}
@Override
public void init() {
System.out.println("Subclass.init called");
}
}
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
new Subclass();
}
}
That prints "Subclass.init called" as expected. I suspect something else is wrong in code that you haven't shown us.
Note that calling virtual methods in a constructor is a risky business - the subclass won't have been initialized yet - all the variables will have their default values, for example. It's generally a pattern to be avoided.
You can fix this by changing your declaration to:
private TextBox myTextBox;
The assignment to null serves no useful purpose. If there was no superclass, it would do nothing, because fields are initialised to null anyway. Since there is a superclass, it acts as a gunshot to the foot. So, get rid of it.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With