Menu
Does bitbake store the shell-commands invoked (along the the path of invocation)? I can find the shell-command output in the log-files, but would like to view the actual command line.
999
Bitbake Commands. Bitbake Command. Description. bitbake <image>. Bake an image (add -k to continue building even errors are found in the tasks execution) bitbake <package> -c <task>. Execute a particular package's task. Default Tasks names: fetch, unpack, patch, configure, compile, install, package, package_write, and build.
Executing tasks for a single recipe file is relatively simple. You specify the file in question, and BitBake parses it and executes the specified task. If you do not specify a task, BitBake executes the default task, which is "build”.
To build any particular recipe or image, need to run the below command. If you want to only compile the bitbake recipe then run the below command. Suppose if you want to clean the build output of a particular recipe then you need to run the below command. # It removes all the file related to the recipe like sstate cahche and build output files.
GNU Make achieves its control through “makefiles”. BitBake uses “recipes”. BitBake executes tasks according to provided metadata that builds up the tasks. Metadata is stored in recipe (.bb), configuration (.conf), and class (.bbclass) files and provides BitBake with instructions on what tasks to run and the dependencies between those tasks.
Short answer: Yes. The run.* log files, found in the same directory as the log.* files are the are produced from the actual scripts that get executed by bitbake. Everything you need is there. They aren't trivial, because every aspect of the environment is set up, so they are cumbersome to read, but it's all there.
Have fun!
118
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
