I'm currently in the process of teaching recursion in a programming class. I noticed how hard it is for my students to grasp the concept of recursion. Is there a nice way to visualize what the function does for the pedagogical purposes?
As an example, here is an R function for getting the n'th Fibonacci number:
fib_r <- function(n) {
if(n <= 2) return(1)
fib_r(n-1) + fib_r(n-2)
}
Thanks.
Bottom-up. Sometimes the best way to improve the efficiency of a recursive algorithm is to not use recursion at all. In the case of generating Fibonacci numbers, an iterative technique called the bottom-up approach can save us both time and space.
This is how I would go about explaining recursive functions in R
:
First, I agree with @AEBilgrau that the factorial is a good example for recursion. (Better than Fibonacci in my opionion.)
Then I would quickly go through the theoretical basis why the factorial can be defined as a recursive function, something simple like
4! = 4 * 3 * 2 * 1 = 4 * 3!
Then you could present them the respective recursive R
function
fact = function(x) if (x == 0) return(1) else return(x * fact(x - 1))
fact(3)
#6
but present them also the following output
#|fact(3) called
#|fact(3) is calculated via 3*fact(2)
#|fact(2) is unknown yet. Therefore calling fact(2) now
#|Waiting for result from fact(2)
#| fact(2) called
#| fact(2) is calculated via 2*fact(1)
#| fact(1) is unknown yet. Therefore calling fact(1) now
#| Waiting for result from fact(1)
#| | fact(1) called
#| | fact(1) is calculated via 1*fact(0)
#| | fact(0) is unknown yet. Therefore calling fact(0) now
#| | Waiting for result from fact(0)
#| | | fact(0) called
#| | | fact(0)=1 per definition. Nothing to calculate.
#| | | fact(0) returning 1 to waiting fact(1)
#| | fact(1) received 1 from fact(0)
#| | fact(1) can now calculate 1*fact(0)=1*1=1
#| | fact(1) returning 1 to waiting fact(2)
#| fact(2) received 1 from fact(1)
#| fact(2) can now calculate 2*fact(1)=2*1=2
#|fact(3) received 2 from fact(2)
#|fact(3) can now calculate 3*fact(2)=3*2=6
#[1] 6
as derived from
# helper function for formatting
tabs = function(n) paste0("|", rep("\t", n), collapse="")
fact = function(x) {
# determine length of call stack
sfl = length(sys.frames()) - 1
# we need to define tmp and tmp1 here because they are used in on.exit
tmp = NULL
tmp1 = NULL
# on.exit will print the returned function value when we exit the function ...
# ... i.e., when one function call is removed from the stack
on.exit({
if (sfl > 1) {
cat(tabs(sfl), "fact(", x, ") returning ",
tmp, " to waiting fact(", x + 1, ")\n", sep="")
}
})
cat(tabs(sfl), "fact(", x, ") called\n", sep="")
if (x == 0) {
cat(tabs(sfl), "fact(0)=1 per definition. Nothing to calculate.\n", sep="")
# set tmp for printing in on.exit
tmp = 1
return(1)
} else {
# print some info for students
cat(tabs(sfl), "fact(", x,
") is calculated via ", x, "*fact(", x - 1, ")\n", sep="")
cat(tabs(sfl),"fact(",x - 1,
") is unknown yet. Therefore calling fact(",
x - 1, ") now\n", sep="")
cat(tabs(sfl), "Waiting for result from fact(",
x - 1, ")\n", sep="")
#call fact again
tmp1 = fact(x - 1)
#more info for students
cat(tabs(sfl), "fact(", x, ") received ", tmp1,
" from fact(", x - 1, ")\n", sep="")
tmp = x * tmp1
cat(tabs(sfl), "fact(", x, ") can now calculate ",
x, "*fact(", x - 1, ")=", x, "*", tmp1,
"=", tmp, "\n", sep="")
return(tmp)
}
}
fact(3)
Here's my example, probably used in quite a few textbooks:
recursive_sum <- function(n){
if(n == 1) {print("Remember 1, add everything together"); return(n)}
print(paste0("Remember ", n, ", pass ", n-1, " to recursive function"))
n + recursive_sum(n-1)
}
Output:
> recursive_sum(4)
[1] "Remember 4, pass 3 to recursive function"
[1] "Remember 3, pass 2 to recursive function"
[1] "Remember 2, pass 1 to recursive function"
[1] "Remember 1, add everything together"
[1] 10
I think the factorial function is a good example for recursion. Combining this with a printout (as others suggest) seem like a good way to describe what is going on:
factorial <- function(n) {
cat("factorial(", n, ") was called.\n", sep = "")
if (n == 0) {
return(1)
} else {
return(n * factorial(n - 1))
}
}
factorial(4)
#factorial(4) was called.
#factorial(3) was called.
#factorial(2) was called.
#factorial(1) was called.
#factorial(0) was called.
#[1] 24
You can also then implement a non-recursive factorial function and compare the computational efficiencies. Or maybe ask them what is problematic with the above implementation (e.g what happens with factorial(-4)
).
Regarding a more proper visualization (and not just easy examples), there are websites which illustrate the recursion tree.
Edit: Googling recursion is also a useful lesson.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With