I have property definition in class where i have only Counters, this must be thread-safe and this isn't because get
and set
is not in same lock, How to do that?
private int _DoneCounter;
public int DoneCounter
{
get
{
return _DoneCounter;
}
set
{
lock (sync)
{
_DoneCounter = value;
}
}
}
If it's critical that you read the correct values each time, then you'll need to make the property thread-safe. In this article, I'll show two ways to make this property thread-safe: by using a lock and by using the Interlocked class.
First of all, the answer is NO. The method is not thread-safe, because the counter++ operation is not atomic, which means it consists more than one atomic operations. In this case, one is accessing value and the other is increasing the value by one.
Thread Safe List With the ConcurrentBag Class in C# The ConcurrentBag class is used to create a thread-safe, unordered collection of data in C#. The ConcurrentBag class is very similar to the List in C# and can be used as a thread-safe list in C#. To use the ConcurrentBag class, we have to import the System.
If you're looking to implement the property in such a way that DoneCounter = DoneCounter + 1
is guaranteed not to be subject to race conditions, it can't be done in the property's implementation. That operation is not atomic, it actually three distinct steps:
DoneCounter
.DoneCounter
.You have to guard against the possibility that a context switch could happen in between any of those steps. Locking inside the getter or setter won't help, because that lock's scope exists entirely within one of the steps (either 1 or 3). If you want to make sure all three steps happen together without being interrupted, then your synchronization has to cover all three steps. Which means it has to happen in a context that contains all three of them. That's probably going to end up being code that does not belong to whatever class contains the DoneCounter
property.
It is the responsibility of the person using your object to take care of thread safety. In general, no class that has read/write fields or properties can be made "thread-safe" in this manner. However, if you can change the class's interface so that setters aren't necessary, then it is possible to make it more thread-safe. For example, if you know that DoneCounter only increments and decrements, then you could re-implement it like so:
private int _doneCounter;
public int DoneCounter { get { return _doneCounter; } }
public int IncrementDoneCounter() { return Interlocked.Increment(ref _doneCounter); }
public int DecrementDoneCounter() { return Interlocked.Decrement(ref _doneCounter); }
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With