I know how to disable all unknown #pragma warnings. The answer was given, for example, in How can I disable #pragma warnings?.
Is there a way to disable an 'unknown pragma' warning for one particular pragma? For example, if I disable warning for #pragma ugubugu
the following code:
#pragma ugubugu #pragma untiunti int main() {return 0;}
when compiled with either:
g++ pragma.cpp -Wall clang++ pragma.cpp -Wall
should produce a single warning:
warning: ignoring #pragma untiunti
Maybe, for example, is there a simple way to register a custom pragma which would do nothing?
It would be great to know if there is such an option is Visual Studio too, but that is less important.
"But why ultimately is he playing with custom pragmas?"
My source code is parsed by two compilers. In one of those, there is a special #pragma
that is unknown to the other. Of course, I could probably put #ifdef COMPILER_IDENTIFICATION_MACRO ... #endif
around every instance of the #pragma
, but that would be cumbersome.
I'm reasonably sure that there isn't any way to do this.
Both GCC and Clang do have internal interfaces which allow the language frontend to register #pragma
handlers with the preprocessor - see GCC's libcpp/directives.c
and Clang's lib/Lex/Pragma.cpp
- but, as far as I can see, there is nothing which lets you modify which handlers are registered (beyond what is implied by the language variant you're compiling for) based on command line options.
I know how to disable all unknown #pragma warnings. The answer was given, for example, here: SO: How to disable #pragma warnings?
Note that the highest voted answer is better than the accepted one there. -Wno-unknown-pragmas
can simply be added on the command line after anything (like -Wall
) which turns the warning on.
My source is parsed by two compilers. In one of those, there is a special
#pragma
, that is unknown to the other. Of course, I could probably put#ifdef COMPILER_IDENTIFICATION_MACRO ... #endif
around every instance of the#pragma
but that would be cumbersome.
From a more philisophical viewpoint, I think this is really the right solution, cumbersome though it may be!
It seems correct to me to hide any #pragma
from a compiler which is not expected to understand it in the way that you intend, given that the whole point of #pragma
is to provide a mechanism for invoking implementation-defined behaviour in the compiler.
(If you do end up doing this, note that Clang defines __clang__
, but both GCC and Clang define __GNUC__
.)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With