Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

how to detect sql server timeout from .NET application without using catch Exception

In my current application, i am performing an update by invoking T-SQL Update command. The problem is when the same record is locked by other users at that time.

At .NET application, the application will wait until SQL Server timeout, then it will throw the SqlException timeout.

Is it possible to perform a check first whether a particular record is locked by other process rather than catching the exception ?

like image 462
hadi teo Avatar asked Apr 27 '10 06:04

hadi teo


1 Answers

No, not really.

The standard way is to use try/catch and handle SqlException Number 1205 (deadlock victim), and retry your query:

    try
    {
        // do stuff...
    }
    catch (SqlException sqlEx)
    {
        switch (sqlEx.Number)
        {
            case -2:   // Client Timeout
            case 701:  // Out of Memory
            case 1204: // Lock Issue 

            case 1205: // >>> Deadlock Victim
                // handle deadlock
                break;

            case 1222: // Lock Request Timeout
            case 2627: // Primary Key Violation
            case 8645: // Timeout waiting for memory resource 
            case 8651: // Low memory condition 
            ...
        }
    }

[Note: break statements not added for compactness

Also note, many locking issues can be eliminated by providing the appropriate covering indexes.

like image 108
Mitch Wheat Avatar answered Sep 20 '22 08:09

Mitch Wheat