Imagine a class including comparable like this:
class Element
  include Comparable
  attr_accessor :name, :pos_x, :pos_y
  def initialize(name, pos_x, pos_y)
    @name = name
    @pos_x = pos_x
    @pos_y = pos_y
  end
  def <=>(other)
    if (@pos_x == other.pos_x) and (@pos_y == other.pos_y)
      return 0
    else 
      return @name <=> other.name
    end
  end
  def eql?(other)
    self == other
  end
end
How would you implement the hash function such that a.hash == b.hash in this case? In general I'd do:
def hash
  @name.hash
end
But this does not include pos_x and pos_y.
Unfortunately this is mathematically impossible to define a valid hash function in this case.
Let a, b be two elements with equal positions, and different names. According to eql? definition, this implies that h(a) == h(b). Since this is true for any names values, the hash function is to be independent on name attribute, which is however in contradiction with the second check. Hence there is no hash function for this eql? definition. Sorry. :(
Update:
As noted by toro2k -  your equality definition is not transitive. In general if a == b and b == c, it is required that a == c. According to your eql? function:
{pos_x: 1, pos_y: 1, name: 'a'} == {pos_x: 1, pos_y: 1, name: 'b'}
{pos_x: 1, pos_y: 1, name: 'b'} == {pos_x: 2, pos_y: 2, name: 'b'}
but
{pos_x: 1, pos_y: 1, name: 'a'} != {pos_x: 2, pos_y: 2, name: 'b'}
That's the root of your problem here.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With