How to deal with persistent storage (e.g. databases) in Docker

Question

How do people deal with persistent storage for your Docker containers?

I am currently using this approach: build the image, e.g. for PostgreSQL, and then start the container with

docker run --volumes-from c0dbc34fd631 -d app_name/postgres 

IMHO, that has the drawback, that I must not ever (by accident) delete container "c0dbc34fd631".

Another idea would be to mount host volumes "-v" into the container, however, the userid within the container does not necessarily match the userid from the host, and then permissions might be messed up.

Note: Instead of --volumes-from 'cryptic_id' you can also use --volumes-from my-data-container where my-data-container is a name you assigned to a data-only container, e.g. docker run --name my-data-container ... (see the accepted answer)

Answer 1

In Docker release v1.0, binding a mount of a file or directory on the host machine can be done by the given command:

$ docker run -v /host:/container ... 

The above volume could be used as a persistent storage on the host running Docker.

Answer 2

Docker 1.9.0 and above

Use volume API

docker volume create --name hello docker run -d -v hello:/container/path/for/volume container_image my_command 

This means that the data-only container pattern must be abandoned in favour of the new volumes.

Actually the volume API is only a better way to achieve what was the data-container pattern.

If you create a container with a -v volume_name:/container/fs/path Docker will automatically create a named volume for you that can:

1. Be listed through the docker volume ls
2. Be identified through the docker volume inspect volume_name
3. Backed up as a normal directory
4. Backed up as before through a --volumes-from connection

The new volume API adds a useful command that lets you identify dangling volumes:

docker volume ls -f dangling=true 

And then remove it through its name:

docker volume rm <volume name> 

As @mpugach underlines in the comments, you can get rid of all the dangling volumes with a nice one-liner:

docker volume rm $(docker volume ls -f dangling=true -q) # Or using 1.13.x docker volume prune 

Docker 1.8.x and below

The approach that seems to work best for production is to use a data only container.

The data only container is run on a barebones image and actually does nothing except exposing a data volume.

Then you can run any other container to have access to the data container volumes:

docker run --volumes-from data-container some-other-container command-to-execute 

• Here you can get a good picture of how to arrange the different containers.
• Here there is a good insight on how volumes work.

In this blog post there is a good description of the so-called container as volume pattern which clarifies the main point of having data only containers.

Docker documentation has now the DEFINITIVE description of the container as volume/s pattern.

Following is the backup/restore procedure for Docker 1.8.x and below.

BACKUP:

sudo docker run --rm --volumes-from DATA -v $(pwd):/backup busybox tar cvf /backup/backup.tar /data 

• --rm: remove the container when it exits
• --volumes-from DATA: attach to the volumes shared by the DATA container
• -v $(pwd):/backup: bind mount the current directory into the container; to write the tar file to
• busybox: a small simpler image - good for quick maintenance
• tar cvf /backup/backup.tar /data: creates an uncompressed tar file of all the files in the /data directory

RESTORE:

# Create a new data container $ sudo docker run -v /data -name DATA2 busybox true # untar the backup files into the new container᾿s data volume $ sudo docker run --rm --volumes-from DATA2 -v $(pwd):/backup busybox tar xvf /backup/backup.tar data/ data/sven.txt # Compare to the original container $ sudo docker run --rm --volumes-from DATA -v `pwd`:/backup busybox ls /data sven.txt 

Here is a nice article from the excellent Brian Goff explaining why it is good to use the same image for a container and a data container.