I usually use the UUID class to generate unique IDs. This works fine if these IDs are used by technical systems only, they don't care how long they are:
System.out.println(UUID.randomUUID().toString());
> 67849f28-c0af-46c7-8421-94f0642e5d4d
Is there a nice way to create user friendly unique IDs (like those from tinyurl) which are a bit shorter than the UUIDs? Usecase: you want to send out IDs via Mail to your customers which in turn visit your site and enter that number into a form, like a voucher ID.
I assume that UUIDs get generated equally through the whole range of the 128 Bit range of the UUID. So would it be sage to use just the lower 64 Bits for instance?
System.out.println(UUID.randomUUID().getLeastSignificantBits());
Any feedback is welcome.
The simplest way to generate identifiers is by a serial number. A steadily increasing number that is assigned to whatever you need to identify next. This is the approached used in most internal databases as well as some commonly encountered public identifiers.
UUID (Universally Unique Identifier), also known as GUID (Globally Unique Identifier) represents a 128-bit long value that is unique for all practical purposes.
UUID was standardized by the Open Software Foundation (OSF), becoming a part of the Distributed Computing Environment (DCE). Different versions of UUID follow the RFC 4122 specification. UUIDs are generated using an algorithm based on a timestamp and other factors such as the network address.
I assume that UUIDs get generated equally through the whole range of the 128 Bit range of the UUID.
First off, your assumption may be incorrect, depending on the UUID type (1, 2, 3, or 4). From the Java UUID docs:
There exist different variants of these global identifiers. The methods of this class are for manipulating the Leach-Salz variant, although the constructors allow the creation of any variant of UUID (described below).
The layout of a variant 2 (Leach-Salz) UUID is as follows: The most significant long consists of the following unsigned fields:
0xFFFFFFFF00000000 time_low
0x00000000FFFF0000 time_mid
0x000000000000F000 version
0x0000000000000FFF time_hi
The least significant long consists of the following unsigned fields:
0xC000000000000000 variant
0x3FFF000000000000 clock_seq
0x0000FFFFFFFFFFFF node
The variant field contains a value which identifies the layout of the UUID. The bit layout described above is valid only for a UUID with a variant value of 2, which indicates the Leach-Salz variant.
The version field holds a value that describes the type of this UUID. There are four different basic types of UUIDs: time-based, DCE security, name-based, and randomly generated UUIDs. These types have a version value of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively.
The best way to do what you're doing is to generate a random string with code that looks something like this (source):
public class RandomString {
public static String randomstring(int lo, int hi){
int n = rand(lo, hi);
byte b[] = new byte[n];
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
b[i] = (byte)rand('a', 'z');
return new String(b, 0);
}
private static int rand(int lo, int hi){
java.util.Random rn = new java.util.Random();
int n = hi - lo + 1;
int i = rn.nextInt(n);
if (i < 0)
i = -i;
return lo + i;
}
public static String randomstring(){
return randomstring(5, 25);
}
/**
* @param args
*/
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(randomstring());
}
}
If you're incredibly worried about collisions or something, I suggest you base64
encode your UUID which should cut down on its size.
Moral of the story: don't rely on individual parts of UUIDs as they are holistically designed. If you do need to rely on individual parts of a UUID, make sure you familiarize yourself with the particular UUID type and implementation.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With