I want to show someone how using is
instead of ==
to compare integers can fail. I thought this would work, but it didn't:
>>> import copy
>>> x = 1
>>> y = copy.deepcopy(x)
>>> x is y
True
I can do this easily for bigger integers:
>>> x = 500
>>> y = 500
>>> x is y
False
How can I demonstrate the same thing with smaller integers which might typically be used for enum-like purposes in python?
The following example fails in both Python 2 and 3:
>>> n=12345
>>> ((n**8)+1) % (n**4) is 1
False
>>> ((n**8)+1) % (n**4) == 1
True
The reasons are slightly different. Python 2 uses the int
type for small integers and the long
type for arbitrary precision values. Only the int
type is interned so the example fails when a 1L
is returned.
Python 3 only uses the arbitrary precision type (and renamed it to int
). The example fails because the remainder calculation internally computes a value of 1 and returns it. The interning check is only done when objects are created and the object was created at the start of the calculation before it had the value 1.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With