I use the following code try to create an array of string vectors, I hope to have an array of 3 items, each item is a string vector :
Vector<String> Result_Vector_Array[]=new Vector<String>[3];
But NB highlighted the line as error(generic array creation), what's wrong ? What's the correct way to do it ? I know there is also Arraylist, but it's not synchronized, so I want to use vector.
Due to type erasure, the JVM doesn't know at runtime that you have a Vector
of String
. The best it can do is create a 'raw' Vector. It can't guarantee for you that all Vector
s actually contain String
s. That's why you get a warning from your IDE.
One way to work around this, it cast it, as jgubby suggests. Another is to put a List
into your Vector
s, instead of an array.
But, more importantly, why can the array have only 3 items? Wouldn't it be better to create a class with three fields to put into your Vector
? With three items, that's not too much work, and you get the added bonus that you can give each of the three elements a helpful name, which should make your code a lot clearer.
Also, since Java 6, there exist a number of useful new synchronized List
implementations, which might perform better than Vector
, such as CopyOnWriteArrayList
, or wrap a regular List
in a Collections.synchronizedList
.
You cannot create an array like that, do this:
Vector<String> Result_Vector_Array[] = (Vector<String>[]) new Vector[3];
I would suggest a different approach - arrays of containers like that are often quite hard to use, and don't help in the understanding of your code.
PS Also worth noting that the java naming convention would be
Vector<String> resultVectorArray[] = (Vector<String>[]) new Vector[3];
and it's not usual to include the type in the name (I suspect this will be contentious!), why not just call it 'result' and let the type system worry about the type?
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With