I want to create a numpy array in which each element must be a list, so later I can append new elements to each.
I have looked on google and here on stack overflow already, yet it seems nowhere to be found.
Main issue is that numpy assumes your list must become an array, but that is not what I am looking for.
We can use NumPy np. array tolist() function to convert an array to a list. If the array is multi-dimensional, a nested list is returned. For a one-dimensional array, a list with the array elements is returned.
You can also create a Python list and pass its variable name to create a Numpy array. You can confirm that both the variables, array and list , are a of type Python list and Numpy array respectively. To create a two-dimensional array, pass a sequence of lists to the array function.
It is possible. However, it's not possible to have a list containing multiple types. The hack is to create all Object arrays and store your values, but if you need this kind of hack you should probably rethink about your approach. I agree with @BackSlash, I would recommend rethinking your approach to your problem.
As you discovered, np.array
tries to create a 2d array when given something like
A = np.array([[1,2],[3,4]],dtype=object)
You have apply some tricks to get around this default behavior.
One is to make the sublists variable in length. It can't make a 2d array from these, so it resorts to the object array:
In [43]: A=np.array([[1,2],[],[1,2,3,4]]) In [44]: A Out[44]: array([[1, 2], [], [1, 2, 3, 4]], dtype=object)
And you can then append values to each of those lists:
In [45]: for i in A: i.append(34) In [46]: A Out[46]: array([[1, 2, 34], [34], [1, 2, 3, 4, 34]], dtype=object)
np.empty
also creates an object array:
In [47]: A=np.empty((3,),dtype=object) In [48]: A Out[48]: array([None, None, None], dtype=object)
But you then have to be careful how you change the elements to lists. np.fill
is tempting, but has problems:
In [49]: A.fill([]) In [50]: A Out[50]: array([[], [], []], dtype=object) In [51]: for i in A: i.append(34) In [52]: A Out[52]: array([[34, 34, 34], [34, 34, 34], [34, 34, 34]], dtype=object)
It turns out that fill
puts the same list in all slots, so modifying one modifies all the others. You can get the same problem with a list of lists:
In [53]: B=[[]]*3 In [54]: B Out[54]: [[], [], []] In [55]: for i in B: i.append(34) In [56]: B Out[56]: [[34, 34, 34], [34, 34, 34], [34, 34, 34]]
The proper way to initial the empty
A
is with an iteration, e.g.
In [65]: A=np.empty((3,),dtype=object) In [66]: for i,v in enumerate(A): A[i]=[v,i] In [67]: A Out[67]: array([[None, 0], [None, 1], [None, 2]], dtype=object) In [68]: for v in A: v.append(34) In [69]: A Out[69]: array([[None, 0, 34], [None, 1, 34], [None, 2, 34]], dtype=object)
It's a little unclear from the question and comments whether you want to append to the lists, or append lists to the array. I've just demonstrated appending to the lists.
There is an np.append
function, which new users often misuse. It isn't a substitute for list append. It is a front end to np.concatenate
. It is not an in-place operation; it returns a new array.
Also defining a list to add with it can be tricky:
In [72]: np.append(A,[[1,23]]) Out[72]: array([[None, 0, 34], [None, 1, 34], [None, 2, 34], 1, 23], dtype=object)
You need to construct another object array to concatenate to the original, e.g.
In [76]: np.append(A,np.empty((1,),dtype=object)) Out[76]: array([[None, 0, 34], [None, 1, 34], [None, 2, 34], None], dtype=object)
In all of this, an array of lists is harder to construct than a list of lists, and no easier, or faster, to manipulate. You have to make it a 2d array of lists to derive some benefit.
In [78]: A[:,None] Out[78]: array([[[None, 0, 34]], [[None, 1, 34]], [[None, 2, 34]]], dtype=object)
You can reshape, transpose, etc an object array, where as creating and manipulating a list of lists of lists gets more complicated.
In [79]: A[:,None].tolist() Out[79]: [[[None, 0, 34]], [[None, 1, 34]], [[None, 2, 34]]]
===
As shown in https://stackoverflow.com/a/57364472/901925, np.frompyfunc
is a good tool for creating an array of objects.
np.frompyfunc(list, 0, 1)(np.empty((3,2), dtype=object))
If you really need a 1-d array of lists you will have to wrap your lists in your own class as numpy will always try to convert your lists to arrays inside of an array (which is more efficient but obviously requires constant size-elements), for example through
class mylist: def __init__(self, l): self.l=l def __repr__(self): return repr(self.l) def append(self, x): self.l.append(x)
and then you can change any element without changing the dimension of others
>>> x = mylist([1,2,3]) >>> y = mylist([1,2,3]) >>> import numpy as np >>> data = np.array([x,y]) >>> data array([[1,2,3], [1,2,3]], dtype=object) >>> data[0].append(2) >>> data array([[1,2,3,2], [1,2,3]], dtype=object)
As suggested by ali_m
there is actually a way to force numpy to simply create a 1-d array for references and then feed them with actual lists
>>> data = np.empty(2, dtype=np.object) >>> data[:] = [1, 2, 3], [1, 2, 3] >>> data array([[1, 2, 3], [1, 2, 3]], dtype=object) >>> data[0].append(4) >>> data array([[1, 2, 3, 4], [1, 2, 3]], dtype=object)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With