At CppCon 2015, S. Lavavej from Microsoft said to avoid using result_of
. But I have a situation in which I can't seem to be able to find a proper alternative.
Consider the following code. Is there any way to change std::result_of<F()>::type
to use decltype
instead?
#include <iostream>
#include <future>
#include <type_traits>
template<typename T>
struct NopErrCB
{
constexpr T operator() () const { return T(); }
};
template <typename Func, typename ErrCB>
struct SafeTaskWrapper {
Func f;
ErrCB errCB;
template <typename... T>
auto operator()(T&&... args) -> decltype(f(args...)) {
try
{
return f(std::forward<T>(args)...);
}
catch (...)
{
return errCB();
}
}
};
// vvv OVER HERE vvv
template <typename F>
SafeTaskWrapper<F, NopErrCB<typename std::result_of<F()>::type>> make_safe_task(F&& f) {
return { std::forward<F>(f) };
}
template <typename F, typename ErrCB>
SafeTaskWrapper<F, ErrCB> make_safe_task(F&& f, ErrCB&& cb) {
return { std::forward<F>(f), std::forward<ErrCB>(cb) };
}
int main() {
auto futA = std::async(std::launch::async, make_safe_task([] { throw "A"; return 1; }));
auto futB = std::async(std::launch::async, make_safe_task([] { throw "B"; return 1; }, [] { return 2; }));
auto futC = std::async(std::launch::async, make_safe_task([] { throw "C"; }));
std::cout << futA.get() << std::endl;
std::cout << futB.get() << std::endl;
futC.get();
}
PS. Please don't mind the purpose of the SafeTaskWrapper. I know a future already handles C++ exceptions. This is just a demo, the actual code is for handling Windows SEH exceptions, but that doesn't matter for this question.
You might use
decltype(std::declval<F>()())
instead of
typename std::result_of<F()>::type
which are similar, but have subtle differences
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With