What's the best way (fastest performance) to convert from []int8
to string?
For []byte
we could do string(byteslice)
, but for []int8
it gives an error:
cannot convert ba (type []int8) to type string
I got the ba
from SliceScan()
method of *sqlx.Rows
that produces []int8
instead of string
Is this solution the fastest?
func B2S(bs []int8) string {
ba := []byte{}
for _, b := range bs {
ba = append(ba, byte(b))
}
return string(ba)
}
EDIT my bad, it's uint8
instead of int8
.. so I can do string(ba)
directly.
Note beforehand: The asker first stated that input slice is []int8
so that is what the answer is for. Later he realized the input is []uint8
which can be directly converted to string
because byte
is an alias for uint8
(and []byte
=> string
conversion is supported by the language spec).
You can't convert slices of different types, you have to do it manually.
Question is what type of slice should we convert to? We have 2 candidates: []byte
and []rune
. Strings are stored as UTF-8 encoded byte sequences internally ([]byte
), and a string
can also be converted to a slice of runes. The language supports converting both of these types ([]byte
and []rune
) to string
.
A rune
is a unicode codepoint. And if we try to convert an int8
to a rune
in a one-to-one fashion, it will fail (meaning wrong output) if the input contains characters which are encoded to multiple bytes (using UTF-8) because in this case multiple int8
values should end up in one rune
.
Let's start from the string "世界"
whose bytes are:
fmt.Println([]byte("世界"))
// Output: [228 184 150 231 149 140]
And its runes:
fmt.Println([]rune("世界"))
// [19990 30028]
It's only 2 runes and 6 bytes. So obviously 1-to-1 int8
->rune
mapping won't work, we have to go with 1-1 int8
->byte
mapping.
byte
is alias for uint8
having range 0..255
, to convert it to []int8
(having range -128..127
) we have to use -256+bytevalue
if the byte value is > 127 so the "世界"
string
in []int8
looks like this:
[-28 -72 -106 -25 -107 -116]
The backward conversion what we want is: bytevalue = 256 + int8value
if the int8
is negative but we can't do this as int8
(range -128..127) and neither as byte
(range 0..255) so we also have to convert it to int
first (and back to byte
at the end). This could look something like this:
if v < 0 {
b[i] = byte(256 + int(v))
} else {
b[i] = byte(v)
}
But actually since signed integers are represented using 2's complement, we get the same result if we simply use a byte(v)
conversion (which in case of negative numbers this is equivalent to 256 + v
).
Note: Since we know the length of the slice, it is much faster to allocate a slice with this length and just set its elements using indexing []
and not calling the built-in append
function.
So here is the final conversion:
func B2S(bs []int8) string {
b := make([]byte, len(bs))
for i, v := range bs {
b[i] = byte(v)
}
return string(b)
}
Try it on the Go Playground.
Not entirely sure it is the fastest, but I haven't found anything better.
Change ba := []byte{}
for ba := make([]byte,0, len(bs)
so at the end you have:
func B2S(bs []int8) string {
ba := make([]byte,0, len(bs))
for _, b := range bs {
ba = append(ba, byte(b))
}
return string(ba)
}
This way the append function will never try to insert more data that it can fit in the slice's underlying array and you will avoid unnecessary copying to a bigger array.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With