I need to implemented security for client-server communication. I have implemented the following hybrid cryptosystem
To encrypt a message addressed to Alice in a hybrid cryptosystem, Bob does the following:
To decrypt this hybrid ciphertext, Alice does the following:
I am using RSA For a public-key cryptosystem, and AES for symmetric-key cryptosystem. Every thing works fine, but I am not sure how to handle AES initialization vector. Currently, I am concatenating the AES key and initialization vector encrypting it with the public key and sending that to server.
I just wanted to get some opinions about this approach. How this problem is solved by other communication protocols SSL etc.
Thanks.
AES is a symmetric algorithm, so it does not have public and private keys - only a shared secret. Show activity on this post. In the simplest form: AES is a symetric algorithm, it uses the same key for encryption and decryption.So tat whoever has the key can read your message.
In the example above, an iv is created by generating a random string of the same length as the block size (so our iv will be 16 bytes, or characters, as we mentioned above). This value is then passed in to the initialization of the cipher so that it can be used by the library code when encrypting the value.
Salt is necessary to prevent pre-computation attacks. An IV (or nonce with counter modes) makes the same plain text produce different cipher texts. The prevents an attacker from exploiting patterns in the plain text to garner information from a set of encrypted messages.
AES doesn't have a concept of a salt. It just takes data, and a key. For the same input, it will always generate the same output. How you combine your message with your salt is up to you.
You don't encrypt the IV. Bundle it with the encrypted key and send it (in the clear) to the recipient.
Standards for this do exist. This scheme is called "KeyTransRecipientInfo" in CMS (upon which S/MIME is based), and PGP offers a similar mode. TLS also includes the initialization vector as a parameter in the key encryption algorithm identifier, using the same ASN.1 syntax as CMS. A robust, open-source library to perform this operation is available for many, many platforms.
At the very least, studying the CMS specification might help avoid some of the many pitfalls in a home-brew implementation. See §6.1 and §6.2.1 of RFC 3369.
I've done the same thing, and I handled it the same way - concatenate the AES key with the IV and encrypt them both.
You could also just send the key and use the key itself to generate an IV - for example by using the first 128 bits of a hash of the key as the IV. That should be OK security-wise as long as you are generating a new AES key for each session and not re-using the same AES key over and over with the same IV.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With