In trying to evaluate Clang on Windows, utilizing the Windows Universal C Run-Time (...\Windows Kits\10\Include\10.0.15063.0\ucrt) I was immediately facing unexpected wall, in the form of an undisclosed and unexpected dependency on Microsoft's Visual Studio. Apparently even the simplest C program will not be able to compile as soon as you include any standard C header, because they all seem to end-up attempting to #include vcruntime.h (which is not part of the UCRT).
My questions are:
MSVCRT vs UCRT These are two variants of the C standard library on Microsoft Windows. MSVCRT (Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime) is available by default on all Microsoft Windows versions, but due to backwards compatibility issues is stuck in the past, not C99 compatible and is missing some features.
We recommend you install this version for all applications created using Visual Studio 2015, 2017, 2019, or 2022.
The C runtime Library (CRT) is the part of the C++ Standard Library that incorporates the ISO C standard library. The Visual C++ libraries that implement the CRT support native code development, and both mixed native and managed code. All versions of the CRT support multi-threaded development.
The Universal CRT (UCRT) is a Microsoft Windows operating system component. It's included as part of the operating system in Windows 10 or later, and Windows Server 2016 or later. The UCRT is available by using Windows Update on older operating systems that are still in extended support.
Check out [MSDN.Blogs]: Introducing the Universal CRT (and also the other URLs that it references). Emphases are mine:
In June of last year we published a pair of articles discussing the major changes that we had made to the Visual C++ C Runtime (CRT) for Visual Studio 2015.
...
The AppCRT and DesktopCRT have been recombined into a single library, which we have named the Universal CRT. The new DLLs are named ucrtbase.dll (release) and ucrtbased.dll (debug); they do not include a version number because we’ll be servicing them in-place.
From [MS.DevBlogs]: The Great C Runtime (CRT) Refactoring
In order to unify these different CRTs, we have split the CRT into three pieces:
VCRuntime (vcruntime140.dll) ...
AppCRT (appcrt140.dll) ...
DesktopCRT (desktopcrt140.dll) ...
According to [MS.Support]: Update for Universal C Runtime in Windows:
Microsoft Visual Studio 2015 creates a dependency on the Universal CRT when applications are built by using the Windows 10 Software Development Kit (SDK).
and from [MS.Dev]: Windows 10 SDK:
Note: Windows 10 development targeting Windows 10, version 1803 (or later) requires Visual Studio 2017. This SDK will not be discovered by previous versions of Visual Studio.
So, UCRT is strictly bound to VStudio. Universal: means that it's not dependent on VStudio version (all VStudio versions will use a common one (there can be only one)).
Personal opinion: UCRT is the Win (wannabe) equivalent of Nix's libc.
I took a look in SDK include dir (e.g. "c:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Kits\10\Include\10.0.15063.0\ucrt"):
#include <corecrt.h>
#include <vcruntime.h>
no #ifdef
s, so there is no way (at least no easy one) to overcome this.
But, things are even clearer when reaching link phase. If your C code includes UCRT headers, it will (most likely) link to files from SDK lib dir (e.g. "c:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Kits\10\Lib\10.0.15063.0\ucrt\x64"), which are generated by VStudio, and there's a great chance for that to fail. Example:
code00.c:
//#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
//printf("Dummy.... sizeof(void*): %d\n", sizeof(void*));
return 0;
}
Output:
[cfati@CFATI-5510-0:e:\Work\Dev\StackOverflow\q045340527]> sopr.bat *** Set shorter prompt to better fit when pasted in StackOverflow (or other) pages *** [prompt]> dir /b code00.c [prompt]> "c:\Install\x86\Microsoft\Visual Studio Community\2015\VC\bin\cl.exe" -nologo -c -Focode00.obj code00.c code00.c [prompt]> "c:\Install\Google\Android_SDK\ndk-bundle\toolchains\llvm\prebuilt\windows-x86_64\bin\clang.exe" -c -o code00.o code00.c [prompt]> dir /b code00.c code00.o code00.obj
The 2 (generated) files are incompatible:
[prompt]> "C:\Install\x86\Microsoft\Visual Studio Community\2015\VC\bin\amd64\dumpbin.exe" -nologo code00.obj Dump of file code00.obj File Type: COFF OBJECT Summary 80 .debug$S 2F .drectve 7 .text$mn [prompt]> "C:\Install\x86\Microsoft\Visual Studio Community\2015\VC\bin\amd64\dumpbin.exe" -nologo code00.o Dump of file code00.o code00.o : warning LNK4048: Invalid format file; ignored Summary [prompt]> "c:\Install\x64\Cygwin\Cygwin\AllVers\bin\readelf.exe" -d code00.o [prompt]> "c:\Install\x64\Cygwin\Cygwin\AllVers\bin\readelf.exe" -d code00.obj readelf: Error: Not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start
Now, I know that lld (I remember that I built it in the past, but I can't find it, in order to test my statement) is able to link both ELF and COFF file formats, but I doubt that it can combine them.
Conclusion
Based on the above, here are the answers to your questions:
I suppose it is - an unsupported one though (claiming that something is impossible is almost always false). But, there would be lots of restrictions (consider the above file format matching), and would most likely require some dirty tricks or (lame) workarounds (gainarii) like (some that I can think of now):
#include
s)Adding VStudio (or anything else, as a matter of fact) in the name would automatically decrease its "universality level".
And this is only the 1st step: it has been separated from VC Runtime. Think of it as of a baby. In time, it will become mature (and more stable,) and maybe other compilers / build toolchains will end up supporting it as well (no need to follow the spartan rules, and throw it off the cliff :) ... at least not right now).
But, I think only MS could have an answer to this (although there's a great chance that they won't provide a clearer one)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With