Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

How to avoid stack overflow errors when defining set accessor in C#

People of stackoverflow. I am new to c# and this is the first time I have not been able to find an answer to one of my elementary questions. Who can help me?!I am trying to define set logic for a public instance field.

This runs flawlessly,

public string Headline {get; set;}

This results in stack overflow

public string Headline
{ get { return Headline; } set { Headline = value; } }

like image 492
TheMildyInformedCitizen Avatar asked Nov 25 '13 16:11

TheMildyInformedCitizen


2 Answers

You're calling the getter and setter recursively (calling themselves infinitely), inevitably causing a stack overflow.

Surely this is what you mean to be doing:

private string headline;
public string Headline
{
    get { return headline; }
    set { headline = value; }
}

Note that this is unnecessary if you don't plan to introduce any further get/set logic, as this is exactly what your first example does behind the scenes.

When learning about properties in c#, it helps to think of them not as data, but as a pair of methods with the following signatures:

public string get_Headline() { ... }
public void set_Headline(string value) { ... }

In fact, this is exactly how the compiler defines them.

Now it's easy to see that your initial code would call set_Headline recursively.

like image 140
Rotem Avatar answered Nov 09 '22 11:11

Rotem


You need a backing field if you are trying to use set and get with your property.

private string _headline; //backing field.

public string Headline
{
    get { return _headline; }
    set { _headline = value; }
} 

In your current code, you are trying to set your property recursively, and thus resulting in stackoverflow exception

like image 39
Habib Avatar answered Nov 09 '22 11:11

Habib