Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

How to avoid anemic domain models, or when to move methods from the entities into services

I have a common scenario that I am looking for some guidance from people more experienced with DDD and Domain Modeling in general.

Say I start out building a blog engine, and the first requirement is that after an Article is posted, users can start posting Comments on it. This starts fine, and leads to the following design:

public class Article {     public int Id { get; set; }      public void AddComment(Comment comment)     {         // Add Comment     } } 

My MVC Controller is designed like this:

public class ArticleController {     private readonly IRepository _repository;      public ArticleController(IRepository repository)     {         _repository = repository;     }      public void AddComment(int articleId, Comment comment)     {         var article = _repository.Get<Article>(articleId);         article.AddComment(comment);         _repository.Save(article);         return RedirectToAction("Index");     } } 

Now everything works fine, and it meets the requirement. Next iteration we get a requirement that every time a Comment is posted, the blog author should get an email notifying him.

At this point, I have 2 choices that I can think of. 1) Modify Article to require an IEmailService (in the ctor?) or obtain an EmailService from a static reference to my DI container

1a) Seems pretty ugly. I believe it breaks some Domain model rules that my entities are aware of services?

public class Article {     private readonly IEmailService _emailService;      public Article(IEmailService emailService)     {         _emailService = emailService;     }      public void AddComment(Comment comment)     {         // Add Comment          // Email admin         _emailService.SendEmail(App.Config.AdminEmail, "New comment posted!");     } } 

1b) Also seems ugly, I now require a configured DI container which is accessed statically.

public class Article {     public void AddComment(Comment comment)     {         // Add Comment          // Email admin         var emailService = App.DIContainer.Resolve<IEmailService>();         emailService.SendEmail(App.Config.AdminEmail, "New comment posted!");     } } 

2) Create an IArticleService and move the AddComment() method to this service instead of on the Article Entity itself.

This solution is cleaner I believe, but Adding a comment is now less discoverable and requires an ArticleService to perform the work. It seems like AddComment should belong on the Article class itself.

public class ArticleService {     private readonly IEmailService _emailService;      public ArticleService(IEmailService emailService)     {         _emailService = emailService;     }      public void AddComment(Article article, Comment comment)     {         // Add comment          // Email admin         _emailService.SendEmail(App.Config.AdminEmail, "New comment posted!");     }  }   public class ArticleController {     private readonly IRepository _repository;     private readonly IArticleService _articleService;      public ArticleController(IRepository repository, IArticleService articleService)     {         _repository = repository;         _articleService = articleService;     }      public void AddComment(int articleId, Comment comment)     {         var article = _repository.Get<Article>(articleId);         _articleService.AddComment(article, comment);         _repository.Save(article);         return RedirectToAction("Index");     } } 

So I am basically look for advice from people more experienced in domain modeling. If I am missing a more obvious solution please let me know :)

I generally dislike both solutions to be honest, because the Service option is less discoverable. I can no longer add a Comment to an instance of an Article without having an ArticleService available. It also feels less natural, since AddComment seems like such an obvious method on the Article type.

Anyway I look forward to reading the input. Thanks in advance.

like image 859
Matt Hidinger Avatar asked Sep 28 '09 18:09

Matt Hidinger


People also ask

What are anemic domain models?

The Anemic domain model is a programming Anti-pattern where the domain objects contain little or no business logic like validations, calculations, rules, and so forth. The business logic is thus baked into the architecture of the program itself, making refactoring and maintenance more difficult and time-consuming.

What is the main purpose of domain modeling?

Domain Modeling is a way to describe and model real world entities and the relationships between them, which collectively describe the problem domain space.

What makes a good domain model?

A good domain model controls the changes made to its information. This means that it should provide methods for manipulating its contents and prohibit all other changes to the information under its control.

What is the domain in domain modeling?

A domain model is a visual representation of real situation objects in a domain. A domain is an area of concern. Its used to refer to the area you are dealing with. The model is a diagram, for domain models the class diagram UML is mostly used.


2 Answers

I think this particular issue can be solved elegantly with a Domain Event.

like image 115
Mark Seemann Avatar answered Oct 02 '22 12:10

Mark Seemann


Have you considered having the article controller essentially pass a message up / post an event? Then any "article-posted-event-listeners" would consume that message and respond accordingly; in your specific case, an email notifier would be listening for those events and be configured to do so. This way the article posting bits don't need to know anything about the email notifying bits.

like image 32
Mikeb Avatar answered Oct 02 '22 11:10

Mikeb