Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

How much memory does a thread consume when first created?

I understand that creating too many threads in an application isn't being what you might call a "good neighbour" to other running processes, since cpu and memory resources are consumed even if these threads are in an efficient sleeping state.

What I'm interested in is this: How much memory (win32 platform) is being consumed by a sleeping thread?

Theoretically, I'd assume somewhere in the region of 1mb (since this is the default stack size), but I'm pretty sure it's less than this, but I'm not sure why.

Any help on this will be appreciated.

(The reason I'm asking is that I'm considering introducing a thread-pool, and I'd like to understand how much memory I can save by creating a pool of 5 threads, compared to 20 manually created threads)

like image 822
Alan Avatar asked Nov 01 '08 22:11

Alan


People also ask

How much memory does a thread take?

Be mindful of thread use and stack size. The default option -Xss512k means that each thread will use 512kb of memory. The JVM default without this option is 1MB.

What happens when a thread is created?

Multiple threads of the same task have program counters that each point at some place in the shared code section. Creating a thread requires allocating memory to store its stack, and to store its register values when switching between threads. It doesn't affect the code section.

Does each thread has its own memory space?

Explanation: ->Threads in processes has no separate memory space and threads that belongs to process can share the memory to other threads.

Does thread take memory separate RAM?

For example Java methods, thread stacks and native handles are allocated in memory separate from the heap, as well as JVM internal data structures.


3 Answers

I have a server application which is heavy in thread usage, it uses a configurable thread pool which is set up by the customer, and in at least one site it has 1000+ threads, and when started up it uses only 50 MB. The reason is that Windows reserves 1MB for the stack (it maps its address space), but it is not necessarily allocated in the physical memory, only a smaller part of it. If the stack grows more than that a page fault is generated and more physical memory is allocated. I don't know what the initial allocation is, but I would assume it's equal to the page granularity of the system (usually 64 KB). Of course, the thread would also use a little more memory for other things when created (TLS, TSS, etc), but my guess for the total would be about 200 KB. And bear in mind that any memory that is not frequently used would be unloaded by the virtual memory manager.

like image 107
Fabio Ceconello Avatar answered Oct 16 '22 15:10

Fabio Ceconello


Adding to Fabios comments:

Memory is your second concern, not your first. The purpose of a threadpool is usually to constrain the context switching overhead between threads that want to run concurrently, ideally to the number of CPU cores available.

A context switch is very expensive, often quoted at a few thousand to 10,000+ CPU cycles.

A little test on WinXP (32 bit) clocks in at about 15k private bytes per thread (999 threads created). This is the initial commited stack size, plus any other data managed by the OS.

like image 22
peterchen Avatar answered Oct 16 '22 15:10

peterchen


If you're using Vista or Win2k8 just use the native Win32 threadpool API. Let it figure out the sizing. I'd also consider partitioning types of workloads e.g. CPU intensive vs. Disk I/O into different pools.

MSDN Threadpool API docs

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms686766(VS.85).aspx

like image 32
stephbu Avatar answered Oct 16 '22 14:10

stephbu