Class Integer
has cache, which caches the Integer
values. So if I use method valueOf
or inboxing the new value will not be instantiated, but get from the cache.
I know that the default cache size is 127
but can be extended due to VM settings. My question is: how large is the default value of cache size in these settings and can I manipulate this value? Is this value depended on which VM I use (32 or 64 bits)?
I'm now on tuning of a legacy code, and probably will need the conversion from int to Integer.
Clarification: Following code I've found in Java source
private static class IntegerCache {
static final int low = -128;
static final int high;
static final Integer cache[];
static {
// high value may be configured by property
int h = 127;
String integerCacheHighPropValue =
sun.misc.VM.getSavedProperty("java.lang.Integer.IntegerCache.high");
if (integerCacheHighPropValue != null) {
int i = parseInt(integerCacheHighPropValue);
i = Math.max(i, 127);
// Maximum array size is Integer.MAX_VALUE
h = Math.min(i, Integer.MAX_VALUE - (-low));
}
high = h;
cache = new Integer[(high - low) + 1];
int j = low;
for(int k = 0; k < cache.length; k++)
cache[k] = new Integer(j++);
}
private IntegerCache() {}
}
public static Integer valueOf(int i) {
assert IntegerCache.high >= 127;
if (i >= IntegerCache.low && i <= IntegerCache.high)
return IntegerCache.cache[i + (-IntegerCache.low)];
return new Integer(i);
}
So I think the cache is configurable.
Internal Java implementation and could not be configured, the range is from -128 to 127. You can check Javadocs
or simply take a look at sources:
public static Integer valueOf(int i) {
final int offset = 128;
if (i >= -128 && i <= 127) { // must cache
return IntegerCache.cache[i + offset];
}
return new Integer(i);
}
UPD. I was wrong (thx to Marco Topolnik). All of the above is related to older Java implementations. For Java 7 implementation could be achieved with system property:
-Djava.lang.Integer.IntegerCache.high=<size>
or JVM setting:
-XX:AutoBoxCacheMax=<size>
UPD. 2 java.math.BigInteger
has hardcoded cache for values -16 <= x <= 16. From sources:
private final static int MAX_CONSTANT = 16;
private static BigInteger posConst[] = new BigInteger[MAX_CONSTANT+1];
private static BigInteger negConst[] = new BigInteger[MAX_CONSTANT+1];
static {
for (int i = 1; i <= MAX_CONSTANT; i++) {
int[] magnitude = new int[1];
magnitude[0] = i;
posConst[i] = new BigInteger(magnitude, 1);
negConst[i] = new BigInteger(magnitude, -1);
}
}
public static BigInteger valueOf(long val) {
// If -MAX_CONSTANT < val < MAX_CONSTANT, return stashed constant
if (val == 0)
return ZERO;
if (val > 0 && val <= MAX_CONSTANT)
return posConst[(int) val];
else if (val < 0 && val >= -MAX_CONSTANT)
return negConst[(int) -val];
return new BigInteger(val);
}
For Java 7, I wasn’t able to find in Oracle’s java documentation is a description of exactly what would change when -XX:+AggressiveOpts is used. So I ran a process to determine the effect aggressiveopts has on jvm settings on one of our app servers in the lab that had java version: {quote} java version "1.7.0_15" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_15-b03) {quote}
The process is to run java with aggressiveopts disabled: java -d64 -server -XX:-AggressiveOpts -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal -version
The process is to run java with aggressiveopts enabled: java -d64 -server -XX:+AggressiveOpts -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal -version
This process produced these differences:
bool AggressiveOpts false --> true {product}
intx AutoBoxCacheMax 128 --> 20000 {C2 product}
intx BiasedLockingStartupDelay 4000 --> 500 {product}
bool EliminateAutoBox false --> true {C2 diagnostic}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With