I have a dataframe X that looks like this:
A B C D E Identifier
1 2 3 4 5 a
2 3 2 2 1 b
4 5 4 5 3 a
2 3 4 5 6 a
0 0 1 2 3 a
1 2 1 1 1 b
(here the range is 6 as the period over which observations are recorded is 6.)
Now I want to calculate averages for each of A, B, C, D,E based on Identifier. To do that I used Process1
avgcalls <- function(calls){
totcalls <- sum(calls)
out <- totcalls/6
return(out)
}
avgcallsdf <- data.frame((aggregate(X[, 1:4], by = X[6], avgcalls)))
The output looks like this
Identifier A B C D
1 a 1.66667 1.6666667 2.0 2.5
2 b 0.50000 0.8333333 0.5 0.5
Alternatively I did(please suggest a better way to do this)
Process2
samp1<-D[which(D$Identifier=='a')] #creating one dataframe with identifier as 'a'
samp2<-D[which(D$Identifier=='b')]#creating another dataframe with'b'as identifier
#calculating means
mean1<-sum(sampl$A, na.rm=TRUE)/6
mean2<-sum(sampl$B, na.rm=TRUE)/6
mean3<-sum(sampl$C, na.rm=TRUE)/6
mean4<-sum(sampl$D, na.rm=TRUE)/6
mean5<-sum(samp1$E, na.rm=TRUE)/6
finaldf<-data.frame(mean1,mean2,mean3,mean4,mean5)
similarly I do above with samp2 Both results are identical.
My actual data has 1008 columns and around 80,000 rows, will the results vary from Process 1 and Process2 if there are NA's present?
I looked at this Getting different results using aggregate() and sum() functions in R but it wasn't very helpful
We can also use data.table
library(data.table)
setDT(df1)[, lapply(.SD, mean), Identifier]
# Identifier A B C D E
#1: a 1.75 2.5 3.0 4.0 4.25
#2: b 1.50 2.5 1.5 1.5 1.00
If we need the sum divided by n=6
setDT(df1)[, lapply(.SD, function(x) sum(x, na.rm=TRUE)/6), Identifier]
# Identifier A B C D E
#1: a 1.166667 1.6666667 2.0 2.666667 2.8333333
#2: b 0.500000 0.8333333 0.5 0.500000 0.3333333
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With