Short story, I'm implementing a graph and now I'm working on the Kruskal, I need a priority queue. My definition of a priority queue is that the element with the smallest key would come first? Is this wrong? Because when I insert the weighted edges(or numbers) in the queue they don't end up sorted.
PriorityQueue<Integer> tja = new PriorityQueue<Integer>();
tja.add(55);
tja.add(99);
tja.add(1);
tja.add(102);
tja.add(54);
tja.add(51);
System.out.println(tja);
That would print out this; [1, 54, 51, 102, 99, 55]. This is not sorted like I want them to be! And yes I made a comperator that goes into the priority queue that extracts the number from the edge object and compares based on that int. So this should work, or have I just completely misunderstood the entire concept of how this data structure works?
Answer: Yes. Priority Queue allows duplicate values.
Every item has a priority associated with it. An element with high priority is dequeued before an element with low priority. If two elements have the same priority, they are served according to their order in the queue.
A priority queue in Java is a special type of queue wherein all the elements are ordered as per their natural ordering or based on a custom Comparator supplied at the time of creation.
Yes, in C++ priority_queue, we may have duplicate values.
System.out.println is invoking the toString() method, which is using the iterator, which is not guaranteed to respect the natural ordering. From the docs: "The Iterator provided in method iterator() is not guaranteed to traverse the elements of the priority queue in any particular order."
I have no experience with PriorityQueue
in Java but it looks like the priority thing is not integrated into iterator()
or toString()
(which uses iterator()
).
If you do:
while (tja.size()>0)
System.out.println(tja.remove());
You get the proper results.
Are you familiar with functioning of Binary heaps? If not please go through min heap and max heap structures. PriorityQueue is implemented on heaps. PriorityQueue doesn't sort the items in increasing order, but it does the heap sort on it.
Go through the link: Priority Queue
The output you get is correct.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With