There is only one apparently abstract upside of using Lightsail, simplicity, or significantly simplified interface.
Also, the first page of Lightsail talks about lower charges. My question is how is it considered to reduce charges compared to EC2? Consider $5 Lightsail plan which charges $0.0067/hour of an instance (which is the cheapest) where EC2's same type of instance (t2.nano) costs just $0.0059/hour.
What am I missing? A detailed price comparison would be much appreciated showing how Lightsail costs lower as advertised.
Amazon EC2 is a mix of multiple services and has its own individual features used to create a single architecture. Amazon EC2 instances are meant for small to complex architecture. Lightsail, on other hand, is an integrated product of services offered by AWS. Lightsail is better for small to medium scale workloads.
With On-Demand Instance prices starting at $0.0058 per hour, T2 instances are one of the lowest-cost Amazon EC2 instance options and are ideal for a variety of general-purpose applications like micro-services, low-latency interactive applications, small and medium databases, virtual desktops, development, build and ...
Your Lightsail instances are charged only when they're in the running or stopped state. If you delete your Lightsail instance before the end of the month, we only charge you a prorated cost, based on the total number of hours that you used your Lightsail instance.
In general, dedicated host pricing is the most expensive type of EC2 pricing model.
The $5 Amazon LightSail plan includes:
t2.nano
($0.0059c/hr in US regions) = approximately $4.25/monthSo, the real saving appears to be in Data Transfer.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With