When you clone a repository with git clone , it automatically creates a remote connection called origin pointing back to the cloned repository. This is useful for developers creating a local copy of a central repository, since it provides an easy way to pull upstream changes or publish local commits.
The simple answer is that HEAD is a pointer/label to the most recent commit of the branch you are currently on. master is the default branch created when you initialized a git repository (e.g. git init ).
the HEAD is not stepping onto any branch, then above commands do: checkout the target commit (you're already stepping there, but just in case) move master pointer to that commit (no problem, since it is a forward move) checkout master branch in order to be stepping onto it (for future commits)
It represents the default branch on a remote and is a local ref representing a local copy of the HEAD in the remote repository. In summary, origin/HEAD represents the default branch on the remote, which is defined automatically when you clone a repository from the internet.
Note first that your question shows a bit of misunderstanding. origin/HEAD represents the default branch on the remote, i.e. the HEAD that's in that remote repository you're calling origin. When you switch branches in your repo, you're not affecting that. The same is true for remote branches; you might have master
and origin/master
in your repo, where origin/master
represents a local copy of the master
branch in the remote repository.
origin's HEAD will only change if you or someone else actually changes it in the remote repository, which should basically never happen - you want the default branch a public repo to stay constant, on the stable branch (probably master). origin/HEAD is a local ref representing a local copy of the HEAD in the remote repository. (Its full name is refs/remotes/origin/HEAD.)
I think the above answers what you actually wanted to know, but to go ahead and answer the question you explicitly asked... origin/HEAD is set automatically when you clone a repository, and that's about it. Bizarrely, that it's not set by commands like git remote update
- I believe the only way it will change is if you manually change it. (By change I mean point to a different branch; obviously the commit it points to changes if that branch changes, which might happen on fetch/pull/remote update.)
Edit: The problem discussed below was corrected in Git 1.8.4.3; see this update.
There is a tiny caveat, though. HEAD is a symbolic ref, pointing to a branch instead of directly to a commit, but the git remote transfer protocols only report commits for refs. So Git knows the SHA1 of the commit pointed to by HEAD and all other refs; it then has to deduce the value of HEAD by finding a branch that points to the same commit. This means that if two branches happen to point there, it's ambiguous. (I believe it picks master if possible, then falls back to first alphabetically.) You'll see this reported in the output of git remote show origin
:
$ git remote show origin
* remote origin
Fetch URL: ...
Push URL: ...
HEAD branch (remote HEAD is ambiguous, may be one of the following):
foo
master
Oddly, although the notion of HEAD printed this way will change if things change on the remote (e.g. if foo is removed), it doesn't actually update refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
. This can lead to really odd situations. Say that in the above example origin/HEAD actually pointed to foo, and origin's foo branch was then removed. We can then do this:
$ git remote show origin
...
HEAD branch: master
$ git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
refs/remotes/origin/foo
$ git remote update --prune origin
Fetching origin
x [deleted] (none) -> origin/foo
(refs/remotes/origin/HEAD has become dangling)
So even though remote show knows HEAD is master, it doesn't update anything. The stale foo branch is correctly pruned, and HEAD becomes dangling (pointing to a nonexistent branch), and it still doesn't update it to point to master. If you want to fix this, use git remote set-head origin -a
, which automatically determines origin's HEAD as above, and then actually sets origin/HEAD to point to the appropriate remote branch.
It is your setting as the owner of your local repo. Change it like this:
git remote set-head origin some_branch
And origin/HEAD will point to your branch instead of master. This would then apply to your repo only and not for others. By default, it will point to master, unless something else has been configured on the remote repo.
Manual entry for remote set-head provides some good information on this.
Edit: to emphasize: without you telling it to, the only way it would "move" would be a case like renaming the master branch, which I don't think is considered "organic". So, I would say organically it does not move.
What moves origin/HEAD "organically"?
git clone
sets it once to the spot where HEAD is on origin
git clone
What does HEAD on origin represent?
git clone
uses it in such a wayWhat sets origin/HEAD?
git clone
fetches and sets itgit fetch
updates it like any other reference, but it doesn’tgit remote set-head origin -a
fetches and sets it
Trivia
origin/HEAD
can also be set to any other value without contacting the remote: git remote set-head origin <branch>
Disclaimer: this is an update to Cascabel's answer, which I'm writing to save the curious some time.
I tried in vain to replicate (in Git 2.0.1) the remote HEAD is ambiguous
message that Cascabel mentions in his answer; so I did a bit of digging (by cloning https://github.com/git/git and searching the log). It used to be that
Determining HEAD is ambiguous since it is done by comparing SHA1s. In the case of multiple matches we return refs/heads/master if it matches, else we return the first match we encounter. builtin-remote needs all matches returned to it, so add a flag for it to request such.
(Commit 4229f1fa325870d6b24fe2a4c7d2ed5f14c6f771
, dated Feb 27, 2009, found with git log --reverse --grep="HEAD is ambiguous"
)
However, the ambiguity in question has since been lifted:
One long-standing flaw in the pack transfer protocol used by "git clone" was that there was no way to tell the other end which branch "HEAD" points at, and the receiving end needed to guess. A new capability has been defined in the pack protocol to convey this information so that cloning from a repository with more than one branches pointing at the same commit where the HEAD is at now reliably sets the initial branch in the resulting repository.
(Commit 9196a2f8bd46d36a285bdfa03b4540ed3f01f671
, dated Nov 8, 2013, found with git log --grep="ambiguous" --grep="HEAD" --all-match
)
Edit (thanks to torek):
$ git name-rev --name-only 9196a2f8bd46d36a285bdfa03b4540ed3f01f671
tags/v1.8.4.3~3
This means that, if you're using Git v1.8.4.3 or later, you shouldn't run into any ambiguous-remote-HEAD problem.
Remember there are two independent git repos we are talking about. Your local repo with your code and the remote running somewhere else.
Your are right, when you change a branch, HEAD points to your current branch. All of this is happening on your local git repo. Not the remote repo, which could be owned by another developer, or siting on a sever in your office, or github, or another directory on the filesystem, or etc...
Your computer (local repo) has no business changing the HEAD pointer on the remote git repo. It could be owned by a different developer for example.
One more thing, what your computer calls origin/XXX is your computer's understanding of the state of the remote at the time of the last fetch.
So what would "organically" update origin/HEAD? It would be activity on the remote git repo. Not your local repo.
People have mentioned
git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/head/my_other_branch
Normally, that is used when there is a shared central git repo on a server for use by the development team. It would be a command executed on the remote computer. You would see this as activity on the remote git repo.
Run the following commands from git CLI:
# move to the wanted commit
git reset --hard <commit-hash>
# update remote
git push --force origin <branch-name>
It gets set by git clone
and also by git remote add -m master $url
. Other than that you would have to set it manually.
I did sent some patches to be updated with git fetch
as well (depending on some configuration). That would be the most organic way to update it in my opinion. Unfortunately they haven't been merged yet.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With