So we have DRM in our free software browsers now, and apparently it works quite well. The video is however still subject to the usual compositing.
I am running Fedora 25 including the wayland display server. If I do understand its architecture correctly, it basically expects applications to render their content into buffers and arranges the display of the composite (e.g. layering several windows on top of each other). In order to do so, it must have access to the content of these buffers. AFAIK wayland does not come with any DRM. So how is the content protected?
Specifically:
Why should I not be able to:
Typically, streaming platforms, like Netflix, use the encryption technology known as Encrypted Media Extensions (EME), which blocks the user from taking screen captures, screenshots, or screen recordings of the content that the user is playing.
No, Netflix does not allow you to record shows with DVR, but you can capture Netflix with some screen capture software.
From the Channels tab, tap on the Netflix channel and select your show from the list. Select the movie or episode you want and hit the Record button, or Record All to record an entire season of a series. it your TV using a Roku, Chromecast, FireTV or SmartTV. You can choose to auto-skip the ads when you watch!
Why is there always a black screen? Netflix streamed the audio now with multi or dual-tuned and when the signal is not rejoined, it blacks the screen out. This is why every time you try to record something on it, it usually pays you back with a black screen.
EME itself does not prevent you from recording the content - it is not point of EME. EME just provides unified way to communicate with native DRM browser component (called Content Decryption module - aka CDM). That interface allows you to:
All the decryption is done internally - now the meaning of internally is very dependent on what content you are playing and on what platform.
From the commercial content perspective, there is usually different value of content per resolution:
Only very few desktop PCs these days provide security for UHD content. It requires combination of OS and CPU to deliver HW security (you should get that in Edge on Windows 10 with the latest generation of processors). That is in contrast to ARMs where this is standard for many years (and it generally allowed 4k streaming on TVs).
There is also different value of content during consumption:
One thing which is good to point is that lot of DRM protection is about making sure regular users can't just record content. Once you start talking about using special drivers, recompile kernel with modifications or whatever else, you are no longer regular user.
I'm not sure how exactly Google enables Widevine on Linux distros but it does not work on every single distro you choose. Google must kind of "enable" the distro to be supported first. It could be that some driver signature validation is done as well before Widevine is happy to work on the platform - just guessing.
Apart from that:
Why should you not be able to record sound?
You can - audio output is not protected at all.
Why should you not be able to record video?
If you manage to do that, you are working with Decrypted decompressed content I mentioned before. There has been other easier ways to get this content for years and it didn't stop streaming services.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With