Good morning,
I am looking into an inexpensive solution to deliver content to our European customers, I came across Amazon CloudFront. I was wondering if any of you had any experience using this service? If so, what are your thoughts compared to something like Limelight or Akamai?
Thanks!
The main difference between CloudFront and Akamai is the number of PoP servers. CloudFront is using Super PoP approach, which means much fewer (edge) locations (54 as of January 2016 - see complete list here), compared to the thousands that Akamai has around the world. This is why CloudFront costs less than Akamai.
As you can see, Akamai and AWS CloudFront are both powerful content delivery networks that offer a wide range of professional features for delivering data over the internet. While they are equally powerful, these platforms have different strengths that make each better suited for a different use case.
Azure Content Delivery Network (CDN) reduces load times, save bandwidth and speed responsiveness. Amazon CloudFront is a fast content delivery network (CDN) service that securely delivers data, videos, applications, and APIs to customers globally with low latency, high transfer speeds.
I have no real-world experience using CloudFront, but on paper it strikes me as a viable CDN for medium or small volumes, and possibly high variation of volume over time, compared to Akamai's and LimeLight's offerings which may be better for steadily high volumes.
CloudFront is essentially a "pay per use" arrangement, and pricing is pretty transparent. For example, if in a typical month you serve about a million GETs from Europe and a million GETs from the US, each GET delivering about a megabyte, the data transfer will cost you as follows: $1.00
for the US gets, $1.20
for the Europe gets, $170.00
for each of of the two data transfer volumes (1000 GB each), total $342.20
. "No minimum, no cover", no fixed fees, just pay as you go: if next month your volumes double, so will your costs -- if they halve, so will your costs (lower per-GB tariffs only trigger at very high volumes).
In addition, you do have to pay S3 fees as well, since CloudFront edge servers get your data from S3; for the typical case, storage fees will be pennies (your 2000 GB served probably mean just a few GB stored, being served over and over), GET and transfer costs similar to the CloudFront pricing -- however, you typically won't be paying the S3 to edge transfer costs all that often, only when the "cache" kept at the edge nodes needs to be refreshed (so the extra cost depends essentially on the rate of "churn" of your contents).
A very complete article showing all that's needed to use S3 and CloudFront for a simple Ruby on Rails appliation is here -- don't be daunted if you don't do Ruby, it should be simple enough to follow anyway (hey, I don't do Ruby either, but I could follow along;-).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With