Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

How do you clear memory in Javascript?

People also ask

How do I free up memory in JavaScript?

To release memory, assign the global variable to null . window. users = null; I want to make this article as easy to understand as possible.

Do you have to free memory in JavaScript?

In contrast, JavaScript automatically allocates memory when objects are created and frees it when they are not used anymore (garbage collection). This automaticity is a potential source of confusion: it can give developers the false impression that they don't need to worry about memory management.

Where is memory stored in JavaScript?

JavaScript engines have two places where they can store data: The memory heap and stack.

How do I clear memory in node JS?

So how would I do that? There is no memory management in js, you can make sure that the object you created are not being used anywhere in the code, then the garbadge collector will free them. It happens automatically. Once your job is finished, the process will be terminated and garbage collector takes care of it.


The short answer is that you don't. delete simply removes a reference (and not in the way you try to use it, see the above link - delete is one of those language features few people actually understand), nothing more. The implementation clears memory for you, but it's not your business when (and even if, strictly speaking - this is why one shouldn't rely on finalizers in GC'd languages that offer them) it does. Note though:

  • Only objects that can be proven to be unreachable (i.e. no way to access it) to all code can be removed. What keeps references to whom is usually fairly obvious, as least conceptually. You just need to watch out when dealing with lots of closures, as they may capture more variables than you think. Also note that circular references are cleaned up properly.
  • There's a bug in old (but sadly still used) IE versions involving garbage collection of JS event handlers and DOM elements. Google (perhaps even SO) should have better material on my memory.

On the plus side, that means you won't get dangling pointer bugs or (save of course the aforementioned pitfalls) memory leaks.


No, that will not clear memory.

Read this:

http://perfectionkills.com/understanding-delete/


No - Javascript runs GC when it feels like it.


The Delete method only deletes the reference - not the object. Any other references would be left out in the open waiting for the garbage collector.

JavaScript has its own GC, and it will run around and clean things up when nothing refers to them anymore.

I still think it's a good practice to null objects. Deleteing an object also helps the GC because it will see something dangling, and say "I'm going to eat you because you're all alone (and now some cynical laugh)".

You should look at Deleting Objects in JavaScript

Even though there's a GC, you still want to ensure your script is optimized for performance as peoples computers, browsers, and fricken toolbars (and the number of them), will vary.


Generally speaking, memory management in Javascript is user-agent-specific. The basics of the garbage collector are through reference-counting. So, by setting a reference to null (using the delete keyword or by explicit assignment), you can assure yourself that a reference will be cleaned up, IF the object does not have any references that will live outside of its creation scope. That being the case, the GC will have already cleaned up any objects or variables whose scope has ended without your explicitly setting it to null.

There are some things to take care of, though - circular references are easy to create in JS, especially between a DOM element and an object. Care must be taken to clear (or not create in the first place) references to and/or from DOM elements within objects. If you do create a to/from reference related to DOM, be sure to explicitly clean them up by setting the references to null - both on your object and on the DOM element. Simply setting a parent object to null is not sufficient if there are child objects with references to/from DOM or localStorage because those references will live on, and if there was any reference from the child to the parent, then the parent will live on in memory because of that reference.

Web pages can actually leak trash in your memory this way - after you navigate away, the circular references keep objects and DOM elements in memory until you've restarted the browser!

An article on the subject: http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/webprog/jscript/ch11_03.htm, and another detailed look: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2003/09/17/53038.aspx