Menu
Using Material Icons, a plus icon can be added as follows:
<i class="material-icons">add</i> The text add is no longer visible. Why does this happen and where does the plus icon come from? I know it's defined in the font file, but how?
If it's due to the word add linked with the plus icon in the font file, then why doesn't the following work in Bootstrap, with its Glyphicons?
<span style="font-family: 'Glyphicons Halflings'">\20ac</span> 
247
That's how Google's Material Icons work. The string “face” here literally turns into an icon of a face. Then we can, through the power of magical ligatures, turn that text into an icon. That happens automatically when the font-family is set to one that does ligature icons, like Material Icons.
900+ icons all from a single, small file. Served from Google Web Font servers or can be self hosted.
Material Icons is the official repository for Material Design icons and it's owned by Google. There are more or less 1500 icons divided into several categories such as Action, Alert, Av, Communication, Content, etc.
If you want to use Jquery$(". material-icons"). css("color", themeColor); This will change color of the material icons inside an element eg input field.
When you strip all the technical information, the answer is really quite straightforward, the font file incorporates a few tables amongst which:
The one or more aliases/alternative names are the 'ligatures' you are referring to and reside in the font file.
Essentially, when using a character/icon from a font file with ligatures, we have the option to use
<i class="some-font-with-ligatures">&#xxxx;</i> <i class="some-font-with-ligatures">ligature-name or alias</i> That is probably all the important info for a web designer to know.
Go to CSS-Tricks: How do ligature icons work... to see usage examples and a brief explanation.
And if you want to mess around with your own icon font files I suggest you start using the IcoMoon APP:
184
Material Icons. It is possible in a font to define special glyphs for combinations of characters. An example in English is the glyph æ, which is a combination of a and e. This is called a ligature. Other examples are special renderings of ff, ft and tt. Instead of drawing an f followed by another one, the two glyphs are drawn as a single connected glyph: f f versus ff. What the designers of the Material Icons set did is (ab)using this system to make it easy to use icons.
Let's take a step back for a moment. You'll notice in the usage of the add icon that it is possible to include it by directly using a character code that is mapped, in the font, to the correct icon.
<i class="material-icons"></i> This refers to Unicode character U+E145, which falls in one of the Private Use Area blocks of the Unicode specification. This means that no character is usually assigned to this position and every font designer is free to put any glyph they want at that position. Google chose to put the add icon at that spot. Thus, this character, with font family Material Icons, will render as a nice icon.
In addition to that, they created a ligature in their font family that says that the combination of characters add should be rendered as the same glyph. When browsers support ligatures in their font rendering engine, this will result in the same output as using  would.
Google documents this very briefly as well.
In a nutshell: both (U+E145) and the string add will render as 
when using Material Icons.
<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/icon?family=Material+Icons" rel="stylesheet"> As character: <span class="material-icons"></span>.<br> As ligature: <span class="material-icons">add</span>.Boostrap and Glyphicons. The Glyphicons font does not define ligatures, but referencing the correct characters definitely does work. This is exactly what Bootstrap does, by setting (for the plus icon from Glyphicons) content: "\002b";. This sets the content of the span it is applied on to the character represented by the escaped code point U+002B, which is the plus sign. The Glyphicons Halflings font family renders this as some sort of icon, just like Material Icons. The only difference is that the icon is represented by a different character.
Why does using \002B in a span not work, you ask? That's because escaping a Unicode character in CSS is different than in HTML. In HTML, you'd use + instead (or € to get the example you have in your question). You can read more about escaping here.
Thus, + (U+002B) renders as 
and € (U+20AC) renders as 
when using the Glyphicons Halflings font family. You'll notice that for the Glyphicons, they chose to use characters resembling the icons, whereas Material Icons use special, reserved characters.
<link href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.7/css/bootstrap.min.css" rel="stylesheet"/> <span style="font-family: 'Glyphicons Halflings'">+ €</span>If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
