Basically I want to do this:
begin;
lock table a;
alter table a rename to b;
alter table a1 rename to a;
drop table b;
commit;
i.e. gain control and replace my old table while no one has access to it.
Simpler:
BEGIN;
DROP TABLE a;
ALTER TABLE a1 RENAME TO a;
COMMIT;
DROP TABLE
acquires an ACCESS EXCLUSIVE
lock on the table anyway. An explicit LOCK
command is no better. And renaming a dead guy is just a waste of time.
You may want to write-lock the old table while preparing the new, to prevent writes in between. Then you'd issue a lock like this earlier in the process:
LOCK TABLE a IN SHARE MODE;
What happens to concurrent transactions trying to access the table? It's not that simple, read this:
Explains why you may have seen error messages like this:
ERROR: could not open relation with OID 123456
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With