I've read through a good chunk of Expert F# and am working on building an actual application. While debugging, I've grown accustomed to passing fsi commands like this to make things legible in the repl window:
fsi.AddPrinter(fun (x : myType) -> myType.ToString())
I would like to extend this to work with the printf formatter, so I could type e.g.
printf "%A" instanceOfMyType
and control the output for a custom type. The book implies that this can be done (p 93, "Generic structural formatting can be extended to work with any user-defined data types, a topic covered on the F# website"), but I have failed to find any references as to how to actually accomplish this. Does anyone know how? Is it even possible?
Edit:
I should have included a code sample, it's a record type that I'm dealing with, e.g.
type myType = {a: int} override m.ToString() = "hello" let t = {a=5} printfn "%A" t printfn "%A" (box t)
both print statements yield:
{a = 5;}
Generally, printf() function is used to print the text along with the values. If you want to print % as a string or text, you will have to use '%%'.
The printf and format Methodsout. format("The value of " + "the float variable is " + "%f, while the value of the " + "integer variable is %d, " + "and the string is %s", floatVar, intVar, stringVar);
One, the printf (short for "print formatted") function, writes output to the computer monitor. The other, fprintf, writes output to a computer file. They work in almost exactly the same way, so learning how printf works will give you (almost) all the information you need to use fprintf.
In C programming language, %d and %i are format specifiers as where %d specifies the type of variable as decimal and %i specifies the type as integer. In usage terms, there is no difference in printf() function output while printing a number using %d or %i but using scanf the difference occurs.
It looks like the Right Way to do this in F# 2.0 is by using the StructuredFormatDisplay
attribute, for example:
[<StructuredFormatDisplay("hello {a}")>] type myType = {a: int}
In this example, instead of the default {a = 42;}
, you would get hello 42
.
This works the same way for object, record, and union types. And although the pattern must be of the format "PreText {PropertyName} PostText"
(PreText and PostText being optional), this is actually more powerful than ToString()
because:
PropertyName
can be a property of any type. If it is not a string, then it will also be subject to structured formatting. Don Syme's blog gives an example of recursively formatting a tree in this way.
It may be a calculated property. So you could actually get ToString()
to work for record and union types, though in a rather round-about way:
[<StructuredFormatDisplay("{AsString}")>] type myType = {a: int} override m.ToString() = "hello" member m.AsString = m.ToString() // a property that calls a method
By the way, ToString()
will always be used (even for record and union types) if you call printfn "%O"
instead of printfn "%A"
.
Hmm... I vaguely recall some changes to this, but I forget if they happened before or after the CTP (1.9.6.2).
In any case, on the CTP, I see that
type MyType() = override this.ToString() = "hi" let x = new MyType() let xs = Array.create 25 x printfn "%A" x printfn "%A" xs
when evaluated in the VFSI window does what I would want, and that
x;; xs;;
also prints nicely. So, I guess I am unclear how this differs from what is desired?
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With