I have a 32-bit Java service with scalability problems: with high user count we run out of memory because of excessive thread count. In the long term, I plan to switch to 64-bit and to reduce the threads-per-user ratio. In the short term, I'd like to reduce the stack size (-Xss, -XX:ThreadStackSize) to get some more headroom. But this is risky because if I make it too small, I'm going to get StackOverflowErrors.
How can I measure the average and maximum stack size for my application to guide my decision for an optimal -Xss value? I'm interested in two possible approaches:
Update: I know the long-term right way to fix this problem. Please focus on the question I've asked: how do I measure stack depth?
Update 2: I got a nice answer on a related question specifically about JProfiler: Can JProfiler measure stack depth? (I posted the separate question as per JProfiler's community support recommendations)
Count the number of complete strings, multiply by 8 (since "STACK---" is 8 bytes long), and you have the number of bytes of remaining stack space.
size() method in Java is used to get the size of the Stack or the number of elements present in the Stack. Parameters: The method does not take any parameter. Return Value: The method returns the size or the number of elements present in the Stack.
According to the docs: Total stack depth for any Apex invocation that recursively fires triggers due to insert, update, or delete statements is 16.
The default thread stack size is 160KB in 32-bit mode and 320KB in 64-bit mode. If you create a lot of threads, you might run out of stack space. You can increase the size of the threads stack by setting the COBMAINSTACK environment variable.
You can get an idea of the stack depth with something like an aspect that can be woven to your code (load time weaver to allow advising all loaded code except system class loader). The aspect would work around all executed code and would be able to note when you are calling a method and when you return. You can use this to capture most of your stack usage (you'll miss anything loaded from the system class loader, e.g. java.*). While not perfect, it avoids having to change your code to gather StackTraceElement[] at sample points and also gets you into non-jdk code that you might not have written.
For example (aspectj):
public aspect CallStackAdvice {
pointcut allMethods() : execution(* *(..)) && !within(CallStackLog);
Object around(): allMethods(){
String called = thisJoinPoint.getSignature ().toLongString ();
CallStackLog.calling ( called );
try {
return proceed();
} finally {
CallStackLog.exiting ( called );
}
}
}
public class CallStackLog {
private CallStackLog () {}
private static ThreadLocal<ArrayDeque<String>> curStack =
new ThreadLocal<ArrayDeque<String>> () {
@Override
protected ArrayDeque<String> initialValue () {
return new ArrayDeque<String> ();
}
};
private static ThreadLocal<Boolean> ascending =
new ThreadLocal<Boolean> () {
@Override
protected Boolean initialValue () {
return true;
}
};
private static ConcurrentHashMap<Integer, ArrayDeque<String>> stacks =
new ConcurrentHashMap<Integer, ArrayDeque<String>> ();
public static void calling ( String signature ) {
ascending.set ( true );
curStack.get ().push ( signature.intern () );
}
public static void exiting ( String signature ) {
ArrayDeque<String> cur = curStack.get ();
if ( ascending.get () ) {
ArrayDeque<String> clon = cur.clone ();
stacks.put ( hash ( clon ), clon );
}
cur.pop ();
ascending.set ( false );
}
public static Integer hash ( ArrayDeque<String> a ) {
//simplistic and wrong but ok for example
int h = 0;
for ( String s : a ) {
h += ( 31 * s.hashCode () );
}
return h;
}
public static void dumpStacks(){
//implement something to print or retrieve or use stacks
}
}
And a sample stack might be like:
net.sourceforge.jtds.jdbc.TdsCore net.sourceforge.jtds.jdbc.JtdsStatement.getTds()
public boolean net.sourceforge.jtds.jdbc.JtdsResultSet.next()
public void net.sourceforge.jtds.jdbc.JtdsResultSet.close()
public java.sql.Connection net.sourceforge.jtds.jdbc.Driver.connect(java.lang.String, java.util.Properties)
public void phil.RandomStackGen.MyRunnable.run()
Very slow and has its own memory issues but can be workable to get you the stack information you need.
You can then use the max_stack and max_locals for each method in your stack traces to compute a frame size (see class file format) for the method. Based on the vm spec I believe this should be (max_stack+max_locals)*4bytes for the max frame size for a method (long/double occupy two entries on the operand stack/local vars and is accounted for in max_stack and max_locals).
You can easily javap the classes of interest and see the frame values if you don't have that much in your call stacks. And something like asm provides you with some easy tools to use to do this on a larger scale.
Once you have this computed, you need to estimate additional stack frames for JDK classes that might be called by you at your max stack points and add that to your stack sizes. It wont be perfect but it ought to get you a decent starting point for -Xss tuning without hacking around the JVM/JDK.
One other note: I don't know what JIT/OSR does to frame sizes or stack requirements so do be aware that you may have different impacts from -Xss tuning on a cold vs. warm JVM.
EDIT had a few hours of down time and threw together another approach. This is a java agent that will instrument methods to keep track of a max stack frame size and stack depth. This will be able to instrument most of the jdk classes along with your other code and libraries, giving you better results than the aspect weaver. You need asm v4 for this to work. It was more for the fun of it so file this under plinking java for fun, not profit.
First, make something to track the stack frame size and depth:
package phil.agent;
public class MaxStackLog {
private static ThreadLocal<Integer> curStackSize =
new ThreadLocal<Integer> () {
@Override
protected Integer initialValue () {
return 0;
}
};
private static ThreadLocal<Integer> curStackDepth =
new ThreadLocal<Integer> () {
@Override
protected Integer initialValue () {
return 0;
}
};
private static ThreadLocal<Boolean> ascending =
new ThreadLocal<Boolean> () {
@Override
protected Boolean initialValue () {
return true;
}
};
private static ConcurrentHashMap<Long, Integer> maxSizes =
new ConcurrentHashMap<Long, Integer> ();
private static ConcurrentHashMap<Long, Integer> maxDepth =
new ConcurrentHashMap<Long, Integer> ();
private MaxStackLog () { }
public static void enter ( int frameSize ) {
ascending.set ( true );
curStackSize.set ( curStackSize.get () + frameSize );
curStackDepth.set ( curStackDepth.get () + 1 );
}
public static void exit ( int frameSize ) {
int cur = curStackSize.get ();
int curDepth = curStackDepth.get ();
if ( ascending.get () ) {
long id = Thread.currentThread ().getId ();
Integer max = maxSizes.get ( id );
if ( max == null || cur > max ) {
maxSizes.put ( id, cur );
}
max = maxDepth.get ( id );
if ( max == null || curDepth > max ) {
maxDepth.put ( id, curDepth );
}
}
ascending.set ( false );
curStackSize.set ( cur - frameSize );
curStackDepth.set ( curDepth - 1 );
}
public static void dumpMax () {
int max = 0;
for ( int i : maxSizes.values () ) {
max = Math.max ( i, max );
}
System.out.println ( "Max stack frame size accummulated: " + max );
max = 0;
for ( int i : maxDepth.values () ) {
max = Math.max ( i, max );
}
System.out.println ( "Max stack depth: " + max );
}
}
Next, make the java agent:
package phil.agent;
public class Agent {
public static void premain ( String agentArguments, Instrumentation ins ) {
try {
ins.appendToBootstrapClassLoaderSearch (
new JarFile (
new File ( "path/to/Agent.jar" ) ) );
} catch ( IOException e ) {
e.printStackTrace ();
}
ins.addTransformer ( new Transformer (), true );
Class<?>[] classes = ins.getAllLoadedClasses ();
int len = classes.length;
for ( int i = 0; i < len; i++ ) {
Class<?> clazz = classes[i];
String name = clazz != null ? clazz.getCanonicalName () : null;
try {
if ( name != null && !clazz.isArray () && !clazz.isPrimitive ()
&& !clazz.isInterface ()
&& !name.equals ( "java.lang.Long" )
&& !name.equals ( "java.lang.Boolean" )
&& !name.equals ( "java.lang.Integer" )
&& !name.equals ( "java.lang.Double" )
&& !name.equals ( "java.lang.Float" )
&& !name.equals ( "java.lang.Number" )
&& !name.equals ( "java.lang.Class" )
&& !name.equals ( "java.lang.Byte" )
&& !name.equals ( "java.lang.Void" )
&& !name.equals ( "java.lang.Short" )
&& !name.equals ( "java.lang.System" )
&& !name.equals ( "java.lang.Runtime" )
&& !name.equals ( "java.lang.Compiler" )
&& !name.equals ( "java.lang.StackTraceElement" )
&& !name.startsWith ( "java.lang.ThreadLocal" )
&& !name.startsWith ( "sun." )
&& !name.startsWith ( "java.security." )
&& !name.startsWith ( "java.lang.ref." )
&& !name.startsWith ( "java.lang.ClassLoader" )
&& !name.startsWith ( "java.util.concurrent.atomic" )
&& !name.startsWith ( "java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap" )
&& !name.startsWith ( "java.util.concurrent.locks." )
&& !name.startsWith ( "phil.agent." ) ) {
ins.retransformClasses ( clazz );
}
} catch ( Throwable e ) {
System.err.println ( "Cant modify: " + name );
}
}
Runtime.getRuntime ().addShutdownHook ( new Thread () {
@Override
public void run () {
MaxStackLog.dumpMax ();
}
} );
}
}
The agent class has the premain hook for instrumentation. In that hook, it adds a class transformer that instruments in the stack frame size tracking. It also adds the agent to the boot class loader so that it can process jdk classes, too. To do that, we need to retransform anything that might be loaded already, like String.class. But, we have to exclude a variety of things that are used by the agent or the stack logging which lead to infinite loops or other problems (some of that was found by trial and error). Finally, the agent adds a shutdown hook to dump the results to stdout.
public class Transformer implements ClassFileTransformer {
@Override
public byte[] transform ( ClassLoader loader,
String className, Class<?> classBeingRedefined,
ProtectionDomain protectionDomain, byte[] classfileBuffer )
throws IllegalClassFormatException {
if ( className.startsWith ( "phil/agent" ) ) {
return classfileBuffer;
}
byte[] result = classfileBuffer;
ClassReader reader = new ClassReader ( classfileBuffer );
MaxStackClassVisitor maxCv = new MaxStackClassVisitor ( null );
reader.accept ( maxCv, ClassReader.SKIP_DEBUG );
ClassWriter writer = new ClassWriter ( ClassWriter.COMPUTE_FRAMES );
ClassVisitor visitor =
new CallStackClassVisitor ( writer, maxCv.frameMap, className );
reader.accept ( visitor, ClassReader.SKIP_DEBUG );
result = writer.toByteArray ();
return result;
}
}
The transformer drives two separate transformations - one to figure out the max stack frame size for each method and one to instrument the method for recording. It might be doable in a single pass but I didn't want to use the ASM tree API or spend more time figuring it out.
public class MaxStackClassVisitor extends ClassVisitor {
Map<String, Integer> frameMap = new HashMap<String, Integer> ();
public MaxStackClassVisitor ( ClassVisitor v ) {
super ( Opcodes.ASM4, v );
}
@Override
public MethodVisitor visitMethod ( int access, String name,
String desc, String signature,
String[] exceptions ) {
return new MaxStackMethodVisitor (
super.visitMethod ( access, name, desc, signature, exceptions ),
this, ( access + name + desc + signature ) );
}
}
public class MaxStackMethodVisitor extends MethodVisitor {
final MaxStackClassVisitor cv;
final String name;
public MaxStackMethodVisitor ( MethodVisitor mv,
MaxStackClassVisitor cv, String name ) {
super ( Opcodes.ASM4, mv );
this.cv = cv;
this.name = name;
}
@Override
public void visitMaxs ( int maxStack, int maxLocals ) {
cv.frameMap.put ( name, ( maxStack + maxLocals ) * 4 );
super.visitMaxs ( maxStack, maxLocals );
}
}
The MaxStack*Visitor classes handle figuring out the max stack frame size.
public class CallStackClassVisitor extends ClassVisitor {
final Map<String, Integer> frameSizes;
final String className;
public CallStackClassVisitor ( ClassVisitor v,
Map<String, Integer> frameSizes, String className ) {
super ( Opcodes.ASM4, v );
this.frameSizes = frameSizes;
this.className = className;
}
@Override
public MethodVisitor visitMethod ( int access, String name,
String desc, String signature, String[] exceptions ) {
MethodVisitor m = super.visitMethod ( access, name, desc,
signature, exceptions );
return new CallStackMethodVisitor ( m,
frameSizes.get ( access + name + desc + signature ) );
}
}
public class CallStackMethodVisitor extends MethodVisitor {
final int size;
public CallStackMethodVisitor ( MethodVisitor mv, int size ) {
super ( Opcodes.ASM4, mv );
this.size = size;
}
@Override
public void visitCode () {
visitIntInsn ( Opcodes.SIPUSH, size );
visitMethodInsn ( Opcodes.INVOKESTATIC, "phil/agent/MaxStackLog",
"enter", "(I)V" );
super.visitCode ();
}
@Override
public void visitInsn ( int inst ) {
switch ( inst ) {
case Opcodes.ARETURN:
case Opcodes.DRETURN:
case Opcodes.FRETURN:
case Opcodes.IRETURN:
case Opcodes.LRETURN:
case Opcodes.RETURN:
case Opcodes.ATHROW:
visitIntInsn ( Opcodes.SIPUSH, size );
visitMethodInsn ( Opcodes.INVOKESTATIC,
"phil/agent/MaxStackLog", "exit", "(I)V" );
break;
default:
break;
}
super.visitInsn ( inst );
}
}
The CallStack*Visitor classes handle instrumenting methods with code to call the stack frame logging.
And then you need a MANIFEST.MF for the Agent.jar:
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Premain-Class: phil.agent.Agent
Boot-Class-Path: asm-all-4.0.jar
Can-Retransform-Classes: true
Finally, add the following to your java command line for the program you want to instrument:
-javaagent:path/to/Agent.jar
You will also need to have the asm-all-4.0.jar in the same directory as the Agent.jar (or change Boot-Class-Path in the manifest to reference the location).
A sample output might be:
Max stack frame size accummulated: 44140
Max stack depth: 1004
This is all a bit crude but works for me to get going.
Note: the stack frame size isn't a total stack size (still don't really know how to get that one). In practice, there are a variety of overheads for the thread stack. I found that I usually needed between 2 and 3 times the reported stack max frame size as a -Xss value. Oh, and be sure to do the -Xss tuning without the agent loaded as it adds to your stack size requirements.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With