If I try to do the following:
things = 5 print("You have " + things + " things.")
I get the following error in Python 3.x:
Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> TypeError: can only concatenate str (not "int") to str
... and a similar error in Python 2.x:
Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> TypeError: cannot concatenate 'str' and 'int' objects
How can I get around this problem?
If you want to concatenate a string and a number, such as an integer int or a floating point float , convert the number to a string with str() and then use the + operator or += operator.
In Python, we cannot concatenate a string and an integer together. They have a different base and memory space as they are completely different data structures.
To concatenate a string to an int value, use the concatenation operator. Here is our int. int val = 3; Now, to concatenate a string, you need to declare a string and use the + operator.
The problem here is that the +
operator has (at least) two different meanings in Python: for numeric types, it means "add the numbers together":
>>> 1 + 2 3 >>> 3.4 + 5.6 9.0
... and for sequence types, it means "concatenate the sequences":
>>> [1, 2, 3] + [4, 5, 6] [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] >>> 'abc' + 'def' 'abcdef'
As a rule, Python doesn't implicitly convert objects from one type to another1 in order to make operations "make sense", because that would be confusing: for instance, you might think that '3' + 5
should mean '35'
, but someone else might think it should mean 8
or even '8'
.
Similarly, Python won't let you concatenate two different types of sequence:
>>> [7, 8, 9] + 'ghi' Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> TypeError: can only concatenate list (not "str") to list
Because of this, you need to do the conversion explicitly, whether what you want is concatenation or addition:
>>> 'Total: ' + str(123) 'Total: 123' >>> int('456') + 789 1245
However, there is a better way. Depending on which version of Python you use, there are three different kinds of string formatting available2, which not only allow you to avoid multiple +
operations:
>>> things = 5
>>> 'You have %d things.' % things # % interpolation 'You have 5 things.'
>>> 'You have {} things.'.format(things) # str.format() 'You have 5 things.'
>>> f'You have {things} things.' # f-string (since Python 3.6) 'You have 5 things.'
... but also allow you to control how values are displayed:
>>> value = 5 >>> sq_root = value ** 0.5 >>> sq_root 2.23606797749979
>>> 'The square root of %d is %.2f (roughly).' % (value, sq_root) 'The square root of 5 is 2.24 (roughly).'
>>> 'The square root of {v} is {sr:.2f} (roughly).'.format(v=value, sr=sq_root) 'The square root of 5 is 2.24 (roughly).'
>>> f'The square root of {value} is {sq_root:.2f} (roughly).' 'The square root of 5 is 2.24 (roughly).'
Whether you use % interpolation, str.format()
, or f-strings is up to you: % interpolation has been around the longest (and is familiar to people with a background in C), str.format()
is often more powerful, and f-strings are more powerful still (but available only in Python 3.6 and later).
Another alternative is to use the fact that if you give print
multiple positional arguments, it will join their string representations together using the sep
keyword argument (which defaults to ' '
):
>>> things = 5 >>> print('you have', things, 'things.') you have 5 things. >>> print('you have', things, 'things.', sep=' ... ') you have ... 5 ... things.
... but that's usually not as flexible as using Python's built-in string formatting abilities.
1 Although it makes an exception for numeric types, where most people would agree on the 'right' thing to do:
>>> 1 + 2.3 3.3 >>> 4.5 + (5.6+7j) (10.1+7j)
2 Actually four, but template strings are rarely used, and are somewhat awkward.
Other Resources:
string
- Common string operationsIf you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With