bundle install --standalone
seems like a wonderful idea, but I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around how to use it that doesn't wind up requiring you to have rubygems or bundler installed.
It generates a bundler/setup.rb which adds the lib and ext directories of my gems, seemingly in order. Presumably, all I'd need to do is add it to the load path, and all's well.
But bundler/setup.rb doesn't seem to actually require anything.
Now, that's fine, because the normal bundler/setup doesn't require anything either and leaves it to the app to call Bundler.require
Rails by default does the requiring with this little ditty:
if defined?(Bundler)
Bundler.require(*Rails.groups(:assets => %w(development test)))
end
At the point it hits this, Bundler
isn't defined (bundler/setup.rb doesn't define it), so it skips over the block.
So how exactly do I require bundler. If bundle install --standalone
actually bundled bundler, presumably, I could manually call require bundler
and then have Bundler
defined, but it seems to exclude itself from the bundle.
Is there an app out there that actually uses bundle install --standalone
, and if so, how?
To get this to work with Rails, you remove the Bundler.require call and manually add all of the require lines where they're needed.
This has pros and cons. On the plus side, it can make loading your app faster as not all the gems have to be required at load time. It also makes clear what gems are being used where.
On the down side, you have to add all the require calls to your application.
Take a look at Myron Marstons blog post for a better explanation.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With