In the "good old JDBC days" I wrote a lot of SQL code that did very targeted updates of only the "attributes/members" that were actually changed:
For example, consider an object with the following members:
public String name;
public String address;
public Date date;
If only date
was changed in some Business Method I would only issue an SQL UPDATE
for the date
member.
It seems however (that's my "impression" of Hibernate) that when working with a standard Hibernate mapping (mapping the full class), even updates of only a single member lead to a full update of the object in the SQL statements generated by Hibernate.
My questions are:
Is this observation correct, that Hibernate does not intelligently check (in a fully mapped class), what member(s) where changed and then only issue updates for the specific changed members, but rather always will update (in the generated SQL Update Statement) all mapped members (of a class), even if they were not changed (in case the object is dirty due to one member being dirty...)
What can I do to make Hibernate only update those members, that have been changed? I am searching for a solution to have Hibernate only update the member that actually changed.
(I know Hibernate does quite some work on dirty-checking, but as far as I know this dirty checking is only relevant to identify if the object as whole is dirty, not what single member is dirty.)
Hibernate monitors all persistent objects. At the end of a unit of work, it knows which objects have been modified. Then it calls update statement on all updated objects. This process of monitoring and updating only objects that have been changed is called automatic dirty checking in hibernate.
A solution to this problem is to change the default configuration of FlushMode from auto to manual by setting FlushMode. MANUAL . In this way the dirty check mechanism will stop causing the aforementioned synchronization.
Hibernate automatically detects object state changes in order to synchronize the updated state with the database, this is called dirty checking.
Hibernate N+1 problem occurs when you use FetchType. LAZY for your entity associations. If you perform a query to select n-entities and if you try to call any access method of your entity's lazy association, Hibernate will perform n-additional queries to load lazily fetched objects.
Actually, you can specify the options dynamic-update
and dynamic-insert
in a class mapping. It does just that. More info here.
Hibernate just update what you really want to
public class Person {
private Integer id;
public String name;
public String address;
public Date date;
// getter's and setter's
}
And you do something like
Person person = (Person) sessionFactory.openSession().get(Person.class, personId);
person.setName("jean");
Hibernate is smart enough to know just name property has been changed. Although you can see your log as follows
UPDATE PERSON (NAME, ADDRESS, DATE) VALUES (?, ?, ?);
Because Hibernate cache each SQL (INSERT, UPDATE, SELECT) query for EACH entity, again, it just update what you really want to.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With