Is it possible to write a function arity :: a -> Integer
to determine the arity of arbitrary functions, such that
> arity map 2 > arity foldr 3 > arity id 1 > arity "hello" 0
?
1. I define arity as the number of times you can apply an argument to a term.
Arity (/ˈærɪti/ ( listen)) is the number of arguments or operands taken by a function, operation or relation in logic, mathematics, and computer science. In mathematics, arity may also be named rank, but this word can have many other meanings in mathematics.
Fixed arity function is the most popular kind present in almos tall programming languages. Fixed arity function must be called with the same number of arguments as the number of parameters specified in its declaration. Definite arity function must be called with a finite number of arguments.
Haskell - Functions. Functions play a major role in Haskell, as it is a functional programming language. Like other languages, Haskell does have its own functional definition and declaration. Function declaration consists of the function name and its argument list along with its output.
We sometimes have to write a function that is going to be used only once, throughout the entire lifespan of an application. To deal with this kind of situations, Haskell developers use another anonymous block known as lambda expression or lambda function. A function without having a definition is called a lambda function.
That means that any two functions can be compared for equality. Most notably, in Haskell, functions are not in the Eq typeclass (in general). Not any two functions can be compared for equality in Haskell.
Recursion is a situation where a function calls itself repeatedly. Haskell does not provide any facility of looping any expression for more than once. Instead, Haskell wants you to break your entire functionality into a collection of different functions and use recursion technique to implement your functionality.
Yes, it can be done very, very easily:
arity :: (a -> b) -> Int arity = const 1
Rationale: If it is a function, you can apply it to exactly 1 argument. Note that haskell syntax makes it impossible to apply to 0, 2 or more arguments as f a b
is really (f a) b
, i.e. not f applied to a and b
, but (f applied to a) applied to b
. The result may, of course, be another function that can be applied again, and so forth.
Sounds stupid, but is nothing but the truth.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With