Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Has anyone noticed that EF Core 1.0 2015.1 has made the queries very inefficient

After upgrading to Asp.Net Core 2015.1 I have noticed that a lot of EF queries have become a lot slower to run.

I have done some investigation and found that a lot of the queries with where filters now get evaluated in Code, rather than passing the filters to SQL as part of a where clause to run with the query.

We ended up having to re-write a number of our queries as stored procedures to get back performance. Note these used to be efficient prior to the 2015.1 release. Something obviously was changed, and a lot of queries are doing select all queries on a table and then filtering the data in code. This approach is terrible for performance, e.g. reading a table with lots of rows, to filter everything but maybe 2 rows.

I have to ask what changed, and whether anyone else is seeing the same thing?

For example: I have a ForeignExchange table along with a ForeignExchangeRate table which are linked via ForeignExchangeid = ForeignExchangeRate.ForeignExchangeId

await _context.ForeignExchanges
                .Include(x => x.ForeignExchangeRates)
                .Select(x => new ForeignExchangeViewModel
                {
                    Id = x.Id,
                    Code = x.Code,
                    Name = x.Name,
                    Symbol = x.Symbol,
                    CountryId = x.CountryId,
                    CurrentExchangeRate = x.ForeignExchangeRates
                        .FirstOrDefault(y => (DateTime.Today >= y.ValidFrom) 
                                          && (y.ValidTo == null || y.ValidTo >= DateTime.Today)).ExchangeRate.ToFxRate(),
                    HistoricalExchangeRates = x.ForeignExchangeRates
                        .OrderByDescending(y => y.ValidFrom)
                        .Select(y => new FxRate
                        {
                            ValidFrom = y.ValidFrom,
                            ValidTo = y.ValidTo,
                            ExchangeRate = y.ExchangeRate.ToFxRate(),
                        }).ToList()

                })
                .FirstOrDefaultAsync(x => x.Id == id);

And I use this to get the data for editing a foreign exchange rate

So the SQL generated is not as expected. It generates the following 2 SQL statements to get the data

SELECT TOP(1) [x].[ForeignExchangeId], [x].[ForeignCurrencyCode], [x].[CurrencyName], [x].[CurrencySymbol], [x].[CountryId], (
SELECT TOP(1) [y].[ExchangeRate]
FROM [ForeignExchangeRate] AS [y]
WHERE ((@__Today_0 >= [y].[ValidFrom]) AND ([y].[ValidTo] IS NULL OR ([y].    [ValidTo] >= @__Today_1))) AND ([x].[ForeignExchangeId] = [y].[ForeignExchangeId])
)FROM [ForeignExchange] AS [x]
WHERE [x].[ForeignExchangeId] = @__id_2

and

SELECT [y0].[ForeignExchangeId], [y0].[ValidFrom], [y0].[ValidTo], [y0].[ExchangeRate]
FROM [ForeignExchangeRate] AS [y0]
ORDER BY [y0].[ValidFrom] DESC

The second query is the one that causes the slowness. If the table has many rows, then it essentially gets the whole table and filters the data in code

This has changed in the latest release as this used to work in the RC versions of EF

One other query I used to have was the following

         return await _context.CatchPlans
            .Where(x => x.FishReceiverId == fishReceiverId
                     && x.FisherId == fisherId
                     && x.StockId == stockId
                     && x.SeasonStartDate == seasonStartDate
                     && x.EffectiveDate >= asAtDate
                     && x.BudgetType < BudgetType.NonQuotaed)
            .OrderBy(x => x.Priority)
            .ThenBy(x => x.BudgetType)
            .ToListAsync();

and this query ended up doing a Table read (the entire table which was in the tens of thousands of rows) to get a filter subset of between 2 and 10 records. Very inefficient. This was one query I had to replace with a stored procedure. Reduced from approx 1.5-3.0 seconds down to milliseconds. And note this used to run efficiently before the upgrade

like image 907
Grant Nilsson Avatar asked Aug 26 '16 05:08

Grant Nilsson


People also ask

Is Dapper better than Entity Framework?

Dapper is literally much faster than Entity Framework Core considering the fact that there are no bells and whistles in Dapper. It is a straight forward Micro ORM that has minimal features as well. It is always up to the developer to choose between these 2 Awesome Data Access Technologies.

When would you use EF6 vs EF core?

Keep using EF6 if the data access code is stable and not likely to evolve or need new features. Port to EF Core if the data access code is evolving or if the app needs new features only available in EF Core. Porting to EF Core is also often done for performance.

What is a Cartesian explosion?

Cartesian Explosion problem is when you load more and more one-to-many relationships, the amount of duplicate data grows and large number of rows are returned. This will have a large impact on the performance of your application. As you can see from the example, this could get really large very quickly.


1 Answers

This is a known issue on EF core 1.0.The solution right now is to convert all your critical queries to sync one.The problem is on Async queries right now.They'll sort out this issue on EF core 1.1.0 version.But it has not been released yet.

Here is the Test done by the EF core dev team member :

enter image description here

You can find out more info here :EF Core 1.0 RC2: async queries so much slower than sync

Another suggestion I would like to do.That is try your queries with .AsNoTracking().That too will improve the query performance.

.AsNoTracking()

Sometimes you may want to get entities back from a query but not have those entities be tracked by the context. This may result in better performance when querying for large numbers of entities in read-only scenarios.

like image 168
Sampath Avatar answered Oct 13 '22 00:10

Sampath