I want to group elements of a list. I'm currently doing it this way:
public static <E> List<List<E>> group(final List<E> list, final GroupFunction<E> groupFunction) { List<List<E>> result = Lists.newArrayList(); for (final E element : list) { boolean groupFound = false; for (final List<E> group : result) { if (groupFunction.sameGroup(element, group.get(0))) { group.add(element); groupFound = true; break; } } if (! groupFound) { List<E> newGroup = Lists.newArrayList(); newGroup.add(element); result.add(newGroup); } } return result; } public interface GroupFunction<E> { public boolean sameGroup(final E element1, final E element2); }
Is there a better way to do this, preferably by using guava?
Sure it is possible, and even easier with Guava :) Use Multimaps.index(Iterable, Function)
:
ImmutableListMultimap<E, E> indexed = Multimaps.index(list, groupFunction);
If you give concrete use case it would be easier to show it in action.
Example from docs:
List<String> badGuys = Arrays.asList("Inky", "Blinky", "Pinky", "Pinky", "Clyde"); Function<String, Integer> stringLengthFunction = ...; Multimap<Integer, String> index = Multimaps.index(badGuys, stringLengthFunction); System.out.println(index);
prints
{4=[Inky], 6=[Blinky], 5=[Pinky, Pinky, Clyde]}
In your case if GroupFunction is defined as:
GroupFunction<String> groupFunction = new GroupFunction<String>() { @Override public String sameGroup(final String s1, final String s2) { return s1.length().equals(s2.length()); } }
then it would translate to:
Function<String, Integer> stringLengthFunction = new Function<String, Integer>() { @Override public Integer apply(final String s) { return s.length(); } }
which is possible stringLengthFunction
implementation used in Guava's example.
Finally, in Java 8, whole snippet could be even simpler, as lambas and method references are concise enough to be inlined:
ImmutableListMultimap<E, E> indexed = Multimaps.index(list, String::length);
For pure Java 8 (no Guava) example using Collector.groupingBy
see Jeffrey Bosboom's answer, although there are few differences in that approach:
ImmutableListMultimap
but rather Map
with Collection
values,There are no guarantees on the type, mutability, serializability, or thread-safety of the Map returned (source),
EDIT: If you don't care about indexed keys you can fetch grouped values:
List<List<E>> grouped = Lists.transform(indexed.keySet().asList(), new Function<E, List<E>>() { @Override public List<E> apply(E key) { return indexed.get(key); } }); // or the same view, but with Java 8 lambdas: List<List<E>> grouped = Lists.transform(indexed.keySet().asList(), indexed::get);
what gives you Lists<List<E>>
view which contents can be easily copied to ArrayList
or just used as is, as you wanted in first place. Also note that indexed.get(key)
is ImmutableList
.
// bonus: similar as above, but not a view, instead collecting to list using streams: List<List<E>> grouped = indexed.keySet().stream() .map(indexed::get) .collect(Collectors.toList());
EDIT 2: As Petr Gladkikh mentions in comment below, if Collection<List<E>>
is enough, above example could be simpler:
Collection<List<E>> grouped = indexed.asMap().values();
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With