Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Gradle Implementation vs API configuration

I'm trying to figure out what is the difference between api and implementation configuration while building my dependencies.
In the documentation, it says that implementation has better build time, but, seeing this comment in a similar question I got to wonder if is it true.
Since I'm no expert in Gradle, I hope someone can help. I've read the documentation already but I was wondering about an easy-to-understand explanation.

like image 422
reinaldomoreira Avatar asked Jun 07 '17 13:06

reinaldomoreira


People also ask

What is the difference between implementation and API in Gradle?

In the first scenario, LibraryD is compiled by using api . If any change is implemented inside LibraryD, gradle needs to recompile LibraryD, LibraryB and all other modules which import LibraryB as any other module might use implementation of LibraryD.

What is difference between compile and implementation in build Gradle?

Fortunately, the implementation dependency configuration provides the same functionality as compile. You should always use implementation rather than compile for dependencies, as compile is now deprecated or removed in the case of Gradle 7+.

What is API dependency in Gradle?

A Dependency represents a dependency on the artifacts from a particular source. A source can be an Ivy module, a Maven POM, another Gradle project, a collection of Files, etc... A source can have zero or more artifacts.

What is a Gradle configuration?

A “configuration” is a named grouping of dependencies. A Gradle build can have zero or more of them. A “repository” is a source of dependencies. Dependencies are often declared via identifying attributes, and given these attributes, Gradle knows how to find a dependency in a repository.


2 Answers

Gradle compile keyword was deprecated in favor of the api and implementation keywords to configure dependencies.

Using api is the equivalent of using the deprecated compile, so if you replace all compile with api everything will works as always.

To understand the implementation keyword consider the following example.

EXAMPLE

Suppose you have a library called MyLibrary that internally uses another library called InternalLibrary. Something like this:

// 'InternalLibrary' module public class InternalLibrary {     public static String giveMeAString(){         return "hello";     } } 
// 'MyLibrary' module public class MyLibrary {     public String myString(){         return InternalLibrary.giveMeAString();     } } 

Suppose the MyLibrary build.gradle uses api configuration in dependencies{} like this:

dependencies {     api project(':InternalLibrary') } 

You want to use MyLibrary in your code so in your app's build.gradle you add this dependency:

dependencies {     implementation project(':MyLibrary') } 

Using the api configuration (or deprecated compile) you can access InternalLibrary in your application code:

// Access 'MyLibrary' (granted) MyLibrary myLib = new MyLibrary(); System.out.println(myLib.myString());  // Can ALSO access the internal library too (but you shouldn't) System.out.println(InternalLibrary.giveMeAString()); 

In this way the module MyLibrary is potentially "leaking" the internal implementation of something. You shouldn't (be able to) use that because it's not directly imported by you.

The implementation configuration was introduced to prevent this. So now if you use implementation instead of api in MyLibrary:

dependencies {     implementation project(':InternalLibrary') } 

you won't be able to call InternalLibrary.giveMeAString() in your app code anymore.

This sort of boxing strategy allows Android Gradle plugin to know that if you edit something in InternalLibrary, it must only trigger the recompilation of MyLibrary and not the recompilation of your entire app, because you don't have access to InternalLibrary.

When you have a lot of nested dependencies this mechanism can speed up the build a lot. (Watch the video linked at the end for a full understanding of this)

CONCLUSIONS

  • When you switch to the new Android Gradle plugin 3.X.X, you should replace all your compile with the implementation keyword *(1). Then try to compile and test your app. If everything it's ok leave the code as is, if you have problems you probably have something wrong with your dependencies or you used something that now is private and not more accessible. *Suggestion by Android Gradle plugin engineer Jerome Dochez (1))

  • If you are a library mantainer you should use api for every dependency which is needed for the public API of your library, while use implementation for test dependencies or dependencies which must not be used by the final users.

Useful article Showcasing the difference between implementation and api

REFERENCES (This is the same video splitted up for time saving)

Google I/O 2017 - How speed up Gradle builds (FULL VIDEO)

Google I/O 2017 - How speed up Gradle builds (NEW GRADLE PLUGIN 3.0.0 PART ONLY)

Google I/O 2017 - How speed up Gradle builds (reference to 1*)

Android documentation

like image 67
MatPag Avatar answered Nov 15 '22 17:11

MatPag


I like to think about an api dependency as public (seen by other modules) while implementation dependency as private (only seen by this module).

Note, that unlike public/private variables and methods, api/implementation dependencies are not enforced by the runtime. This is merely a build-time optimization, that allows Gradle to know which modules it needs to recompile when one of the dependencies changes its API.

like image 22
dev.bmax Avatar answered Nov 15 '22 17:11

dev.bmax