I'm trying to figure out what is the difference between api
and implementation
configuration while building my dependencies.
In the documentation, it says that implementation
has better build time, but, seeing this comment in a similar question I got to wonder if is it true.
Since I'm no expert in Gradle, I hope someone can help. I've read the documentation already but I was wondering about an easy-to-understand explanation.
In the first scenario, LibraryD is compiled by using api . If any change is implemented inside LibraryD, gradle needs to recompile LibraryD, LibraryB and all other modules which import LibraryB as any other module might use implementation of LibraryD.
Fortunately, the implementation dependency configuration provides the same functionality as compile. You should always use implementation rather than compile for dependencies, as compile is now deprecated or removed in the case of Gradle 7+.
A Dependency represents a dependency on the artifacts from a particular source. A source can be an Ivy module, a Maven POM, another Gradle project, a collection of Files, etc... A source can have zero or more artifacts.
A “configuration” is a named grouping of dependencies. A Gradle build can have zero or more of them. A “repository” is a source of dependencies. Dependencies are often declared via identifying attributes, and given these attributes, Gradle knows how to find a dependency in a repository.
Gradle compile
keyword was deprecated in favor of the api
and implementation
keywords to configure dependencies.
Using api
is the equivalent of using the deprecated compile
, so if you replace all compile
with api
everything will works as always.
To understand the implementation
keyword consider the following example.
EXAMPLE
Suppose you have a library called MyLibrary
that internally uses another library called InternalLibrary
. Something like this:
// 'InternalLibrary' module public class InternalLibrary { public static String giveMeAString(){ return "hello"; } }
// 'MyLibrary' module public class MyLibrary { public String myString(){ return InternalLibrary.giveMeAString(); } }
Suppose the MyLibrary
build.gradle
uses api
configuration in dependencies{}
like this:
dependencies { api project(':InternalLibrary') }
You want to use MyLibrary
in your code so in your app's build.gradle
you add this dependency:
dependencies { implementation project(':MyLibrary') }
Using the api
configuration (or deprecated compile
) you can access InternalLibrary
in your application code:
// Access 'MyLibrary' (granted) MyLibrary myLib = new MyLibrary(); System.out.println(myLib.myString()); // Can ALSO access the internal library too (but you shouldn't) System.out.println(InternalLibrary.giveMeAString());
In this way the module MyLibrary
is potentially "leaking" the internal implementation of something. You shouldn't (be able to) use that because it's not directly imported by you.
The implementation
configuration was introduced to prevent this. So now if you use implementation
instead of api
in MyLibrary
:
dependencies { implementation project(':InternalLibrary') }
you won't be able to call InternalLibrary.giveMeAString()
in your app code anymore.
This sort of boxing strategy allows Android Gradle plugin to know that if you edit something in InternalLibrary
, it must only trigger the recompilation of MyLibrary
and not the recompilation of your entire app, because you don't have access to InternalLibrary
.
When you have a lot of nested dependencies this mechanism can speed up the build a lot. (Watch the video linked at the end for a full understanding of this)
CONCLUSIONS
When you switch to the new Android Gradle plugin 3.X.X, you should replace all your compile
with the implementation
keyword *(1). Then try to compile and test your app. If everything it's ok leave the code as is, if you have problems you probably have something wrong with your dependencies or you used something that now is private and not more accessible. *Suggestion by Android Gradle plugin engineer Jerome Dochez (1))
If you are a library mantainer you should use api
for every dependency which is needed for the public API of your library, while use implementation
for test dependencies or dependencies which must not be used by the final users.
Useful article Showcasing the difference between implementation and api
REFERENCES (This is the same video splitted up for time saving)
Google I/O 2017 - How speed up Gradle builds (FULL VIDEO)
Google I/O 2017 - How speed up Gradle builds (NEW GRADLE PLUGIN 3.0.0 PART ONLY)
Google I/O 2017 - How speed up Gradle builds (reference to 1*)
Android documentation
I like to think about an api
dependency as public (seen by other modules) while implementation
dependency as private (only seen by this module).
Note, that unlike public
/private
variables and methods, api
/implementation
dependencies are not enforced by the runtime. This is merely a build-time optimization, that allows Gradle
to know which modules it needs to recompile when one of the dependencies changes its API.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With