Hypothetical, I run an API and when a user makes a GET request on the user resource, I will return relevant fields as a JSON
type User struct {
  Id      bson.ObjectId `json:"id,omitempty" bson:"_id,omitempty"`
  Name    string        `json:"name,omitempty" bson:"name,omitempty"`
  Secret  string        `json:"-,omitempty" bson:"secret,omitempty"`
}
As you can see, the Secret field in User has json:"-". This implies that in most operation that I would not like to return. In this case, a response would be 
{
  "id":1,
  "Name": "John"
}
The field secret will not be returned as json:"-" omits the field.
Now, I am openning an admin only route where I would like to return the secret field. However, that would mean duplicating the User struct.
My current solution looks like this:
type adminUser struct {      
  Id      bson.ObjectId `json:"id,omitempty" bson:"_id,omitempty"`
  Name    string        `json:"name,omitempty" bson:"name,omitempty"`
  Secret  string        `json:"secret,omitempty" bson:"secret,omitempty"`
}
Is there a way to embed User into adminUser? Kind of like inheritance:
type adminUser struct {      
  User
  Secret  string        `json:"secret,omitempty" bson:"secret,omitempty"`
}
The above currently does not work, as only the field secret will be returned in this case.
Note: In the actual code base, there are few dozens fields. As such, the cost of duplicating code is high.
The actual mongo query is below:
func getUser(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
  ....omitted code...
  var user adminUser
  err := common.GetDB(r).C("users").Find(
      bson.M{"_id": userId},
  ).One(&user)
  if err != nil {
      return
  }
  common.ServeJSON(w, &user)
}
                You should take a look at the bson package's inline flag (that is documented under bson.Marshal). It should allow you to do something like this:
type adminUser struct {
    User `bson:",inline"`
    Secret string `json:"secret,omitempty" bson:"secret,omitempty"`
}
However, now you'll notice that you get duplicate key errors 
when you try to read from the database with this structure, 
since both adminUser and User contain the key secret.
In your case I would remove the Secret field from User 
and only have the one in adminUser. 
Then whenever you need to write to the secret field, 
make sure you use an adminUser.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With