Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Git squash commits in the middle of a branch

Tags:

git

git-squash

I want to squash several commits together in the middle of a branch without modifying the commits before and after.

I have :

A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G |                             | master                        dev origin/master 

I want to squash that into

A -- H -- E -- F -- G |                   | master              dev origin/master 

Where H is equivalent to B -- C -- D. And I want to be able to specify the commit message of H. A is the last commit that has been pushed so all commits after that can be rewritten without messing up the server. The idea is to clean up the history before I fast forward master.

How can I do that ?

PS: Note that in my case I actually have a lot more than 3 commits to squash in the middle, but if I can do it with 3, I should be able to do it with more.

PPS: Also, if possible, I would prefer a solution where E, F and G remain untouched (mostly regarding the commit date).

like image 340
deadbeef Avatar asked Aug 18 '16 16:08

deadbeef


People also ask

How do you squash some commits on a branch?

Git squash with a commit id The last command opens the interactive Git rebase tool which lists all of the commits in the branch. You must type the word pick next to the commit you want all others to be squashed into. Then type 'squash', or just the letter 's', next to each commit to squash.

When should you squash commits?

Before you start, keep in mind that you should squash your commits BEFORE you ever push your changes to a remote repository. If you rewrite your history once others have made changes to it, you're asking for trouble… or conflicts.

How do you squash commits to one commit?

On any given line you can change the command from pick to a command of your choice. I prefer to use the command fixup as this "squashes" the commit's changes into the commit on the line above and discards the commit's message. As the commit on line 1 is HEAD , in most cases you would leave this as pick .


1 Answers

You can do an interactive rebase and hand select the commits which you want to squash. This will rewrite the history of your dev branch, but since you have not pushed these commits, there should not be any negative aftermath from this besides what might happen on your own computer.

Start with the following:

git checkout dev git rebase -i HEAD~6 

This should bring up a window showing you the following list of 7 commits, going back 6 steps from the HEAD of your dev branch:

pick 07c5abd message for commit A pick dl398cn message for commit B pick 93nmcdu message for commit C pick lst28e4 message for commit D pick 398nmol message for commit E pick 9kml38d message for commit F pick 02jmdmp message for commit G 

The first commit shown (A above) is the oldest and the last is the most recent. You can see that by default, the option for each commit is pick. If you finished the rebase now, you would just be retaining each commit as it is, which is effectively a no-op. But since you want to squash certain middle commits, edit and change the list to this:

pick 07c5abd message for commit A pick dl398cn new commit message for "H" goes here squash 93nmcdu message for commit C squash lst28e4 message for commit D pick 398nmol message for commit E pick 9kml38d message for commit F pick 02jmdmp message for commit G 

Note carefully what is happening above. By typing squash you are telling Git to merge that commit into the one above it, which is the commit which came immediately before it. So this says to squash commit D backwards into commit C, and then to squash C into B, leaving you with just one commit for commits B, C, and D. The other commits remain as is.

Save the file (: wq on Git Bash in Windows), and the rebase is complete. Keep in mind you can get merge conflicts from this as you might expect, but there is nothing special about resolving them and you can carry on as you would with any regular rebase or merge.

If you inspect the branch after the rebase, you will notice that the E, F, and G commits now have new hashes, dates, etc. This is because these commits have actually been replaced by new commits. The reason for this is that you rewrote history, and therefore the commits in general can no longer be the same as they were previously.

like image 75
Tim Biegeleisen Avatar answered Sep 28 '22 11:09

Tim Biegeleisen