I have the following situation:
clone
(Y) from a main repository(X), because there were many people working on Y we didn't do any rebase
but only merge
s. When we want to deliver(push
) Y to X we would like to do a rebase
in order to have things nice and cleanThe problem is that when doing rebase
we are asked to do all the merges that we already did in the previous merge
steps. Is there a solution to this, beside the one that means actually re-doing the merges?
I expected it to be pretty straightforward since we already solved the conflicting merges.
git merge --squash
is now my preferred way of rebasing after a large amount of work and many merges (see this answer). If the branch you're working on is called my-branch
and you want to rebase from master
then just do the following:
git checkout my-branch git branch -m my-branch-old git checkout master git checkout -b my-branch git merge --squash my-branch-old git commit
Rebasing to get a "clean" history is overrated. The best way if you want to preserve history is just to do the merge instead of a rebase. That way if you ever need to go back to a revision, it is exactly the same as the one you tested during development. That also solves your issue about the previously solved merge conflicts.
If you don't care about preserving history, you can create a new branch off of master, check it out, then do a git read-tree -u -m dev
to update your working tree to match the dev
branch. Then you can commit everything into one big commit and merge it into master as normal.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With